Showing posts sorted by date for query Larina. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query Larina. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Monday, November 2, 2026

Working the NIGHT SHIFT: Supernatural, The Night the Horror Came Home

Supernatural
 November 2, 1983 was the date Mary Winchester was killed in a fire in her home caused by a demon. Thus, the events of the series Supernatural were set into motion. The series ran on The WB and then The CW for 15 seasons and 327 episodes. It followed the exploits of "hunters" Sam and Dean Winchester and their circle of family and friends as they traveled the highways of the United States hunting monsters. Or as the series put it, "Saving people, hunting things, the family business."

The formula in the beginning was very simple. Sam and Dean would drive around in their black 1967 Chevrolet Impala (which became a character in it's own right), following leads on strange deaths or disappearances, which usually led to some sort of monster, ghost, or other urban legend coming to life (or unlife), killing said creature and moving on to the next one, all while listening to a great 80s soundtrack ("Driver picks the music, shotgun shuts his cakehole"). 

In other words, nearly every Chill game I ever played in.

What made the show successful, and why it managed to run for as many seasons as Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Charmed combined, had a great deal to do with the dedication of an extremely loyal, predominantly female fanbase. This might seem surprising at first glance. It was a show about two brothers driving around America in a late-1960s muscle car, listening to classic rock, drinking beer, and killing monsters. On the surface, it looked like something designed specifically for a male audience. But the show had something else going on, something that its fans recognized almost immediately.

At its heart, Supernatural was about family. 

More specifically, it was about two brothers who loved each other so much that they would literally go to Hell and back for each other. And they did. Repeatedly. The monsters were fun, the car was cool, and the music was great, but the emotional relationships were what kept people coming back. The Winchesters were not simply action heroes. They were damaged people trying to do the right thing in a world that seemed determined to punish them for it.

And then there was their found family of Bobby, Castiel, Charlie, and later on Jack. Even evil characters like Crowley and Rowena were part of the family. 

Fans responded in ways that went well beyond simply watching television. Supernatural developed an enormous online community, with fan fiction, fan art, conventions, and discussions about nearly every aspect of the show. The cast embraced this community, and the community embraced them right back. The phrase "SPNFamily" became more than a clever marketing bit. Fans organized charitable activities, supported mental health initiatives, and built relationships with fans worldwide. Jared Padalecki's "Always Keep Fighting" campaign and Misha Collins' Random Acts charity are especially good examples of this relationship between the performers and their audience. 

Supernatural took their fans seriously and never forgot they had a job because of them.

The show itself understood all this. Episodes like "The Monster at the End of This Book," "The French Mistake," and the 200th episode, "Fan Fiction," showed that the writers understood the fandom and were happy to have fun with it. I can't think of many other shows that made their own fans part of the mythology quite like Supernatural did.

Supernatural DVDs

Of course, fifteen seasons also meant that the show changed quite a bit. What started out as two brothers hunting urban legends eventually became a sprawling mythology involving angels, demons, Heaven, Hell, Purgatory, and even God himself. I will admit that I often preferred the earlier monster-of-the-week episodes. There was something appealing about the idea that Sam and Dean could pull into some little town, discover something terrible was happening, research the local legends, and put a stop to it. Sometimes the simplest stories were the best ones. 

But the show could also be genuinely frightening, surprisingly funny, and occasionally heartbreaking (my youngest cried when Charlie was killed). It understood that horror worked best when the characters had something to lose. Even as the mythology grew increasingly complex, the emotional center remained Sam and Dean. As long as those two were in the Impala, there was still a story worth telling.

Supernatural and NIGHT SHIFT

It shouldn't surprise anyone that Supernatural influenced NIGHT SHIFT: Veterans of the Supernatural Wars in as much as the same sorts of stories and experiences influenced both NIGHT SHIFT and Supernatural. I remember EXACTLY where I was when I first heard about Bloody Mary, or Lilith, or Crossroads, or when I first heard "Carry on Wayward Son."

The idea of ordinary people who encounter the supernatural, survive, and then dedicate themselves to fighting it is fundamental to both. 

The early seasons of Supernatural could practically serve as a model for a NIGHT SHIFT campaign. The characters investigate strange occurrences, interview witnesses, research forgotten folklore, identify what they are dealing with, and figure out how to stop it. Sometimes that means a fight. Other times it means performing a ritual, finding the right weapon, or simply understanding what is really happening. Knowledge and preparation matter as much as being able to hit something.

The show also offered a particularly good example of what we wanted the Veteran character class to represent. Sam and Dean were not traditional fantasy fighters. They knew how to fight, certainly, but they also knew how to research, investigate, improvise, and survive. Their greatest advantage was their experience. They had seen things that most people would never believe, and they had learned how to deal with them.

There is a more personal connection here, too. When we were playtesting NIGHT SHIFT, the two Veteran characters were, for all practical purposes, Sam and Dean Winchester. My two kids played them, and they'd grown up watching Supernatural with us as a family. It was, along with Doctor Who, one of the shows we all watched together. Our enjoyment of the television show and the game influenced each other in completely natural ways. We all understood the characters, the sorts of stories they belonged in, and what they should be able to do. When everyone made their own characters for better testing, they already knew what they wanted.

And that, I think, is one of the more important lessons Supernatural reinforced for me as a game designer. You don't always need an elaborate explanation for why characters are working together. Sometimes they are family. Sometimes they share an experience no one else could possibly understand. Sometimes they are simply the only people who know what is really going on.

I also appreciated the way the show treated folklore and urban legends as material for new stories. Ghosts, vampires, werewolves, demons, witches, and all manner of strange creatures appeared throughout the series. Some were familiar, others much less so. The writers were willing to reinterpret old legends to fit the show's mythology. That is something I have been doing in my own games for decades.

One thing I wanted in NIGHT SHIFT was a game where stories like these felt natural. You could have an adventure involving a haunted house one week, a demonic possession the next, and an ancient conspiracy after that. You could play experienced hunters like Sam and Dean, or people encountering the supernatural for the first time. The game didn't need to be tied to one particular monster or one particular kind of horror.

The other lesson was that characters needed to be more than collections of abilities. Sam and Dean were competent hunters, but their relationships, flaws, fears, and loyalties were what made them memorable. The best role-playing characters work the same way. The monsters give them something to fight. Their relationships give them something worth fighting for.

Supernatural RPGs

Supernatural and My Games

Supernatural also has a natural connection to the sorts of stories I have been developing for Jackson, Illinois. The earliest episodes, especially, have that same small-town American horror atmosphere that I enjoy so much. Strange deaths, forgotten histories, local legends, and ordinary people who don't realize that something terrible is living right next door. Those are all things that would fit perfectly into a Tales of Jackson adventure.

In fact, the Winchesters would have no trouble finding work in Jackson. With its haunted places, strange creatures, thin boundaries between worlds, and more than a few people hiding supernatural secrets, the town would probably keep them busy for quite some time. Though I suspect some of my witches might have a few things to say about two hunters arriving in town and deciding that everything supernatural needed to be killed. Yeah, but lets be honest here. Dean and Stephanie would be terrible for each other in the best possible way, and Sam should wear a T-shirt saying "Larina bait."

That is another difference worth considering. In Supernatural, the protagonists are hunters, and much of the early mythology centers on identifying and eliminating threats. In NIGHT SHIFT, I wanted the supernatural to be more complicated than that. Not every monster is evil, not every witch is dangerous, and not every human being is innocent. Sometimes the real challenge is deciding what should be done rather than simply figuring out how to kill something.

Still, there is something wonderfully appealing about that black Impala rolling into town, two brothers stepping out, and the knowledge that whatever evil is lurking nearby is about to have a very bad day.

Horror Comes Home

Another important connection between Supernatural, NIGHT SHIFT, and my own Tales of Jackson is something I have been exploring for years, especially during my October Horror Movie Challenge. I call it "Horror Comes Home." The idea is simple enough. Horror becomes more immediate, more personal, and often more frightening when it happens somewhere familiar. The haunted house isn't an ancient castle in Transylvania. It is the old house down the street. The monster isn't lurking in some distant wilderness. It is hiding in the woods outside of town. The demon isn't waiting in Hell. It is living next door.

Mary Winchester

Supernatural understood this from the beginning. Sam and Dean spent much of their time traveling through an America that looked familiar to anyone who had ever taken a road trip through the Midwest. Small towns, roadside diners, cheap motels, empty highways, and forgotten places were all potential settings for a horror story. The show drew on American folklore and urban legends, turning familiar places into something strange and dangerous. In many ways, it was doing on television what I had been doing at the gaming table for years.

That same idea is central to Jackson, Illinois. My fictional town is filled with familiar places, schools, hospitals, libraries, shopping malls, and neighborhoods that could exist in almost any Midwestern community in 1986. What makes Jackson different is the supernatural world hiding just out of sight. The horror works because the town itself feels real. The people who live there have ordinary lives, ordinary problems, and ordinary relationships. Then something impossible happens, and those familiar places become frightening.

This theme also runs through many of the movies I watch for my October Horror Movie Challenge. I am particularly drawn to horror films that bring the supernatural into everyday life, where ordinary people discover the world they thought they knew isn't nearly as safe or predictable as they believed. Supernatural took that basic premise and turned it into fifteen seasons of television. It demonstrated that you don't need to travel to another country, continent, or world to find horror. Sometimes you only need to look a little more closely at your own.

Carry On

Fifteen seasons is an extraordinary achievement for any television series, especially one that began as a relatively modest horror show about two brothers chasing urban legends. Supernatural endured because it made its audience care about the people in the story as much as the monsters they fought. Its fans took that connection and built something lasting out of it.

For me, the show will always mean something more. We watched it together as a family. Every episode, every season. My wife, my kids, and me, and it eventually found its way into the games we played together. When I think about Supernatural and its influence on NIGHT SHIFT, that is what stands out the most. 

Saving people. Hunting things. The family business. We didn't have an Impala, but we had dice.

Carry on, my wayward sons.

Friday, October 30, 2026

Urban Fantasy Fridays: NightLife (1990)

NightLife RPG
 NightLife is a game I have had on and off for a number of years. I only ever owned the core rules and the Magic book. I never got a chance to play it, but it is a game we talk about every so often in our Elf Lair Games meetings. The game is quintessentially early 90s. It's filled with blood, dark, and dirty streets, and where you get to play the monster. Vampire: The Masquerade may have done it better, but NightLife gave it its all a year earlier.

NightLife is set in New York. A strange New York that is sandwiched between the movie Warriors and the First World Trade Center bombing.  A city that is hot and perpetually at night. Something like Dark City meets Nightbreed.

NightLife

by Bradley K. McDevitt, L. Lee Cerny, Walter H. Mytczynskyj
1990, 1992 Stellar Games, 256 pages.

Much like Beyond the Supernatural, NightLife is wonderfully crunchy.  Character creation is a prime example. Roll 4d10 for the eight attributes: Strength, Dexterity, Fitness, Intellect, Will, Perception, Attractiveness, and Luck. Then there are another twenty d10s to put toward your skills. And there is a lot of them. It is very much an RPG of its time in that having a skill for something matters, and you will find them for everything from firearms and martial arts to pharmacology, manuscript illumination, seduction, and even skateboarding. Honestly, it already feels like the heart of this game is a cyberpunk game gone horror, splatterpunk. This will not be the last time I feel this while going over the rules.

The underlying system is simple enough. Your attributes and skills yield a percentage, and you roll under on percentile dice. A 20 in a given skill denotes you are competent at the everyday task without needing to make a roll; it is only when things get difficult, or you are under pressure, that the dice come out. Character generation can be a bit of a time sink, but once you are in the game, the central mechanic is not hard to grasp. 

The art is very early 1990s punk style. Cool for the time, but looks a bit dated by today's standards. To be fair, one of the creators, Bradley K. McDevitt, has his own stock-art service, and his stuff is great. I have used his art many, many times in my own work. So, to me, despite its age, the art is very much a "draft" of what I consider "urban horror art." Later on, the artists for Vampire: The Masquerade and WitchCraft RPG would help define this style in my mind. But credit where credit is due for starting here. 

The Kin

What sets this apart is that you do not go after the monsters. You are the monster. Like I mentioned above, it covers similar ground to Vampire: The Masquerade, but the tone here is less Anne Rice. 

The Kin - Daemons

The supernatural types refer to themselves as the Kin, leaving ordinary people with the rather condescending title of "the Herd." The book has seven varieties of Kin: Vampyres, Werewolves, Ghosts, Daemons, Wyghts, Inuits, and Animates. They all have their Edges, or powers, and the traditional Flaws of being a monster. The Magic sourcebook also adds Witches to the mix.

Vampyres are of the old school. Give them sunlight, garlic, a wooden stake, running water, or holy objects, and they will be stopped. They turn into bats, mist, and wolves. These vampyres are more akin to Dracula than Lestat, but his DNA is in there as well. Werewolves change shape. Ghosts are the dead with unfinished business. Animates are your Frankenstein’s monsters and golems. Daemons are extradimensional and have been magically put here. And Wyghts are unpleasant undead affairs that siphon the youth from their victims.

Then we have the Inuits.

Well, yes. This is where the game’s age shows, and not in an endearing way. The handling of Indigenous spirits under that moniker is something I would either not use or rewrite. 

Edges, Flaws, and Humanity

You have Edges, the supernatural side of things. Some are common, some are for a particular Kin. Claws, telepathy, weather control, possession, invisibility, speed, and armor are among the options. But the cleverness lies in the price.

That price is Humanity.

Humanity is not merely a morality stat on the sheet for the GM to levy punishment with. It is a resource to be spent. 

Your monster can do some very cool things, but they are the very things that erode what is human about him. That is a fine mechanic. There is a built-in temptation in the rules. You can have more power, but how much of yourself are you prepared to put on the line?

It goes both ways. High Humanity can make you functionally human. Let it drop, and the character becomes more visibly monstrous, his weaknesses more pronounced. Lose too much Humanity, and now your character has become a true monster and an NPC. I like this idea. The World of Darkness games made this idea their central thesis; other games have a form of this as well. NightLife wasn't the first to do this, but they did do it well.

Edges and Flaws

The City at Night

An urban fantasy needs somewhere for its denizens to put down roots, and NightLife gets that. Not just a crypt or a haunted house. We are talking clubs and bars, record stores, and warehouses. Back rooms and street corners. The sort of places for showing off, making bad decisions, and hearing what is going on. You could say nightclubs are the heart of the game's culture. Style is everything, as is the right music and the right clothes. The book is so preoccupied with fashion that a modern retrospective put it best: in NightLife, a gun can sometimes look like the more economical option than a proper wardrobe.

Then there are the particular modifiers for a fight on the dance floor. That's about as much of a NightLife rule as you will find. I can't think of another game that does that.

Do not mistake this for Gothic horror moved to an urban environment. This is urban horror. The monsters are of the city; they have their neighborhoods and their enemies three blocks away; they have favorite clubs, and they listen to the music. It is easy to see why the comparison to The Warriors holds up.

New York is as much of a character here as it is a setting.

The supernatural is divided into factions and gangs with differing views on humanity. You have the Commune, which is content to let Kin and humans coexist, or the Complex, which would rather control and make use of them. The Morningstar Corporation will undermine society with its wealth and politics, while Red Moonrise is far less subtle and has no qualms about terror and slaughter. And if one wants to be hunted, there are human outfits like the Van Helsing Society and Target Alpha who know the Kin are out there. In short, there is always someone to have a go at. NightLife anticipates as much.

There is some wonderful worldbuilding here that sadly went unnoticed at the time.

Putting the Splatter Back in Splatterpunk

This is no subtle affair. The rulebook will tell you exactly how big a wound is from the damage taken. A Kin can take some horrific injury and come back for more unless put down in a certain way. That kind of durability is what lets the game live up to its splatterpunk side.

City at Night

Shadow of the Vampire

One cannot help but compare this to Vampire: The Masquerade. NightLife came first in 1990 with Vampire behind it in 1991. They share the d10s, the Humanity stat, the urban backdrop and the same sort of player characters. Yet the tone is worlds apart. NightLife is punk where Vampire is Gothic. It is all about the leather jackets and the loud music, the blood on the wall, and the monsters having it out in the alley behind the club. There is plenty of angst to be had, but also a motorcycle chain and a switchblade.

In NightLife, everyone is Clan Brujah or Tremere.

What do I get out of NightLife? More than one might expect.

I am fond of the way it treats Humanity. It is not a passive number for the GM to judge by. Your very existence as a supernatural puts your connection to humanity at risk. I can make a lot of use of that.

I also appreciate the Kin being a single culture. Vampires and werewolves do not need to be in separate societies that never cross paths; they can be in the same faction and have the same enemies. Very fitting for an urban setting. They can still hate each other. Fight in gang wars or even have an uneasy alliance. Same with the other types here. 

The factions are fine, though I would not use them verbatim. What interests me is the concept: supernatural beings at odds over how to deal with ordinary people, and those differences turning political or violent.

But the thing NightLife offers above all is a sense of place. The supernatural has to be somewhere on a Friday night. It may sound foolish, but a community is only convincing when there is a bar they all know, a record store open till two in the morning, a diner where the night staff won’t remark on odd patrons, and an alley to settle scores. I put that to work in NIGHT SHIFT.

For example, in my 1990s sequel to Jackson set in Chicago, Faye Thorne, now calling herself Fiona Voss, runs a record store called Muse. Muse is where people (and not-people) congregate and hear things. Even those who would not normally work together can be found across from each other because they both know it is safe ground. 

And that is what NightLife does best. It is not a matter of monsters hiding in the city, but of them having a life in it. The distinction is important. The vampire has a band he likes. The daemon has a drink with an old friend. The ghost knows her way in. The werewolf has friends and enemies and the clothes and the neighborhood to prove it. The supernatural is not in town for a visit. It lives here.

And regardless of the Kin, they all need somewhere to buy the new Inkubus Sukkubus album. 

My Jackson Kids: Chicago 1992

This campaign does not have a name yet. Nor is it even very well defined. I just know this. Like my real kids, my Jackson, IL kids will grow up and move out at some point. Some end up in Chicago in the 1990s. Why Chicago? Why not! I LOVE Chicago. 

Among the PCs/NPCs I'll work with, there will be Larina, Faye/Fiona, Roderick Morgan, and Moria Zachary. There will be new characters too, but the players will create those. 

Fiona, Larina, and Moria
Fiona, Larina, and Moria, Chicago 1992

And...that is about all I have for that campaign! Really. I have some other idea involving the Maxwell Street Market and other things I loved about Chicago in the 1990s, but this notion is in it's infancy. 

So I am trying out a lot of different ideas. Namely, this campaign is an attempt to move from Modern Horror (Jackson, Sunny Valley) into Urban Fantasy. The horror is still there, but it isn't the same sort of thing.

So, for NightLife, I started with the core book and create a character who fits. I considered turning one of my Jackson kids into a ghost, but in truth I just couldn't bring myself to do that. So instead, I am using a character and keeping her more or less as is. Then I grabbed a copy of the magic book and created twom more characters.

Edited to Add: In my online research, I see that there is a book for NightLife called "America After Dark." I didn't really have the time to buy a copy. Though maybe I will grab it later on since it covers the time period when I was living downtown. In truth I should assemble all the RPGs and supplements that cover Chicago sometime. Especially if I get this Chicago game off the ground.

Moria Lucille Zachary
Moria Lucille Zachary

Race/Kin: Daemon
Age: 21

Abilities
Strength (STR) 23
Dexterity (DEX) 34
Fitness (FIT) 27
Intellect (INT) 26
Will 21
Perception (PER) 27
Attractiveness (ATT) 27
Luck 19
Magic Ability (MA) -

Base Hand-to-Hand (HTH) damage 4
Max Humanity 80
Humanity 36 (40)
Survival Points 46

Edges and Flaws
All Kin
Armor 5, Aura Sight 27, Claws 27, Danger Sense 27, Drain 27 (diet: Human or Animal Life Force), Speed 34

Kin Specific Edges
Alter Form 21, Body Control 27, Flight 27 (true form only), Telepathy 26, Travel 21

Flaws
Substance Vulnerability: Flint, Holy Relics, Fire (double damage), Command: Majestic Daemonic

Skills
Combat Skills
Pistol 41, Streetfighting 52

Archaic Skills
Kin Lore 37

General Skills
Alertness 34, City Knowledge (Chicago) 32, Disguise 30, Language (English) 30, Persuasion 31, Psychology 33, Seduction 31, Stealth 57, Streetwise 42, Theology (Catholic) 32

Occult Skills
Occult Knowledge 34

Connections
Bar Bouncer, Bartender, Police Detective

Money: $13,000.

Moria is great for this. Plus, we haven't seen her in Jackson for a while, so it has a nice "what the hell are you doing here?" vibe. I also like the idea that the girl who was considered dangerous in Jackson is just mildly threatening here in Chicago. 

Larina Stephanie Nichols
Larina Stephanie Nichols

Race/Kin: Human, Witch
Age: 22

Abilities
Strength (STR) 15
Dexterity (DEX) 28
Fitness (FIT) 25
Intellect (INT) 35
Will 34
Perception (PER) 34
Attractiveness (ATT) 30
Luck 21
Magic Ability (MA) 30

Base Hand-to-Hand (HTH) damage 5
Max Humanity 100
Humanity 48 (50)
Survival Points 46

Edges and Flaws
All Kin
None

Kin Specific Edges
None

Flaws
None

Magic
Shadow Paths, Deflection, Escape, Magic Sight, Vibes, Word, EMT, Lighter, Open

Skills
Combat Skills
Knife 31, Pistol 27, Martial Arts (Judo) 42

Archaic Skills
none

General Skills
Alertness 39, City Knowledge (Chicago) 38, Driving 31, First Aid 34, Language (English) 35, Language (Greek) 35, Language (Latin) 35, Persuasion 37, Psychology 43, Research 48, Streetwise 31

Occult Skills
Library Research (Magic) 48, Talismanic Magic 40, Herbal Magic 40, Occult Knowledge 44

Connections
Bar Bouncer, Bartender, Police Detective, Elder Kin

Money: $8,000.

Larina only lives here during her undergraduate and Master's degrees, from fall of 1987 to Spring/summer of 1993. I have her going on other adventures in 1993 that correspond to her Chill 2nd edition period and flowing into her WitchCraft RPG time. Whether those games involve the same "mirror shard" of Larina or not, I don't know yet. But for now, this is Larina in 1992.

Fiona Voss
Fiona Voss

Race/Kin: Human, Sorceress (near Kin)
Age: 22

Abilities
Strength (STR) 20
Dexterity (DEX) 24
Fitness (FIT) 28
Intellect (INT) 34
Will 46
Perception (PER) 30
Attractiveness (ATT) 34
Luck 20
Magic Ability (MA) 35

Base Hand-to-Hand (HTH) damage 4
Max Humanity 80
Humanity 30 (Soul Burn)
Survival Points 48 (36 in stored spells)

Edges and Flaws
All Kin
Drain 28 (Fiona "recharges" herself by going out)

Kin Specific Edges
None

Flaws
Substance Vulnerability: Metorite iron, salt (she makes up for it with hot peppers)

Magic
Black out, Shadow Paths, Deflection, Escape, Hotwire. EMT (white), Dispel Magic (white), boombox (white), Binding (black)

Skills
Combat Skills
Pistol 28, Streetfighting 32

Archaic Skills
Kin Lore 40

General Skills
Administration 42, Alertness 36, Business 44, City Knowledge (Chicago) 42, Dancing 29, Driving 28, Fashion Sense 34, First Aid 38, Intimidation 50, Leadership 54, Musical Style (Goth/Alternative) 46, Profession (Record Store Manager) 46, Research 38, Security Systems 39, Stealth 29, Streetwise 56

Occult Skills
Occult Knowledge 42

In many ways, Fiona has become my standout NPC in my Chicago games. 

Larina is a human witch; Fiona is a near-kin Sorceress. I opted to go in this direction so I could see the differences between the two magic types in the Magic book. Fiona is still recovering from her near Hag-conversion. So her magic feels more like a Kin than Larina's coven magic does. 

So, I want to talk about the differences between Jackson-era Faye and Chicago-Fiona. Same girl, different experiences. In some ways, Fiona becomes more Fiona in NightLife. Faye hated high school, and she hated (hates) Jackson. She flees first to UIUC and then to UIC, but it isn't college or university academics that give her life. It is Chicago. Here is a giant city filled with strange new people, and she LOVES it. 

I get it. I remember leaving class one summer night and looking out at the city from a Blue Line L station and just being in awe of how beautiful it was. In my mind, Faye saw the same sight, but where I was in awe, she fell in love. Faye embraced Chicago in such a fundamentally deep way. From that moment on, she was never, ever going to leave.

NightLife also gave some great ideas for Faye/Fiona regardless of what game system I might use. She works till close at Muse (before she owned it) and then goes out to clubs that would have been too dangerous for a girl in her 20s to go to by herself, but she is a powerful sorceress/witch. She dances until 3 am, eats Thai food or whatever is still open (lots of places), and turns around and goes back to work the next day. 

While all of this is wonderful for Fiona, it is the start of Fiona and Larina growing apart. They still remain close; you can't erase that. But they are setting their sights now in different directions. 

NightLife characters

Jackson to Chicago

I did not set out to create another campaign this month. I certainly don't need another campaign. But somewhere along the way I followed these kids out of Jackson and into Chicago. By 1992 they are no longer kids, and the supernatural isn't something hiding beneath their hometown anymore. It has neighborhoods, jobs, stores, clubs, politics, and a social life. I don't know what I am going to do with that yet. For now I am calling it Chicago 92. I suspect I will be coming back to it. 

Jackson was about discovering the supernatural. Chicago is starting to look like it will be about living with it.

Final Word

NightLife will not replace NIGHT SHIFT on my table. NIGHT SHIFT is just a far better fit for what I want out of a horror RPG. But I would not have NIGHT SHIFT in my hands now if it hadn't been for the nightclubs and streets of NightLife. 

I intended to explore how a single campaign idea could be viewed through the lens of different games; I ended up with much more than that. I got so much out of these games that I think I'll do a proper retrospective later. Likely next month. 

Thursday, October 29, 2026

This Old Dragon: 40 Years of the Dragon #114 Witch

 This October marks the 40th anniversary of the publication of Dragon #114. All year long, I have been waxing nostalgic about my gaming experiences from 1986 and how they set the tone for the next 40 years of my gaming life. I have also spoken at great length about the witches who have shared those gaming experiences with me over the last four decades. 

So I would be remiss if I didn't mark this particular anniversary as something important.

Dragon #114 and the Witch

But the question is, after spending so much time with the witch and this particular issue of Dragon magazine, what do I have left to say?

Turns out, more than I thought.

The Witch on the Page

I have already talked at length about how my understanding of witches and witchcraft grew out of my love of stories about witches, as well as historical documents, and modern occult and New Age interpretations of the witch. So seeing her in the pages of Dragon was exactly the sort of thing I had been looking for at the exact time I was looking for her.

Now, I had been working on my own witches for some time before this issue came out. Some of my earliest surviving notes date back to 1982 at the latest (could be 1981 even, but 82 is a safer bet). But Dragon #114 showed me something bigger than what I had been putting together in my haphazard collection of notebook pages.

This was a complete class.

Based on Ronald Pehr's Witch in The Dragon #20, Bill Muhlhausen created the original witch class, with Kim Mohan and Tom Moldvay revising the version in #43. Roger E. Moore expanded and revised it for #114, with Karen Martin, Robin Jenkins, and Kim Mohan editing.

Beyond the name, beyond the mechanics, and beyond the particular choices made in its design, the Dragon #114 witch taught me something very important.

The witch, as a class, could work.

Maybe not exactly the way I would have done it, but that was part of the lesson, too.

There was one thing about the Dragon #114 witch I never quite agreed with. She was presented primarily as an NPC, and the editors warned she might be too powerful for regular player characters. There was an implication that this character, while maybe not 100% evil, was certainly up to no good (or even good, for that matter; yes, there is a distinction).

But I wanted to play a witch, not just fight one.

I had already been thinking about witches as characters who could be heroes, villains, or anything in between. Their relationship with magic made them witches, not their alignment. And I certainly wasn't interested in limiting my witches to being somebody else's adversary.

That was another lesson I took from Dragon #114. Just because the designers had one particular use in mind didn't mean their rules could accomplish only that. 

I knew the class was capable of more.

"Me and Thee"

The witch I was building and the Dragon #114 witch had many similarities. While I marveled at that back then, the reasons turned out to be largely mundane and practical. We were all reading the same books.

Back in Dragon #43, Tom Moldvay pretty much spelled this out in his revision of the witch class, which would eventually form the basis for the version in #114.

I detailed that here: Tom Moldvay on Witches.

Moldvay outlined six things he felt a witch class needed: herbalism, fascination or charm, a combination of clerical and magic-user abilities, sympathetic magic, secret religious practices, and powers tied to nature and the changing seasons. When I revisited his article in 2011, I added two more things I felt were essential: covens and ritual magic.

Looking back now, I find it remarkable how many of these ideas were already in my notes, even if I hadn't yet figured out how to turn them into workable game mechanics.

Among other things, we agreed that the witch should have a combination of clerical and magic-user spells, though I originally had my witches avoiding flashy magic and spells that did a lot of damage. So, no fireballs. I wanted witches to have magic that was more subtle, more personal, and often more frightening. Curses, charms, divinations, transformations, and magic that could affect people without necessarily blowing them up.

I already had the idea that witches could have healing magic, but never to the degree that clerics did. Herbal healing, potions, and magical cures all seemed perfectly appropriate. A witch should be able to tend to the sick, heal wounds, and perhaps cure certain ailments through her knowledge of herbs and magic. But she should not replace the cleric in an adventuring party. Maybe at low levels she could be a stand-in, but never once the real combat started. ETA: I am reminded of a scene in one of my Jackson playtests where Candy, the "thief," is a better healer than my witches.

Also, under no circumstances would a witch have a Raise Dead spell.

This was something Moldvay's discussion helped me articulate more clearly. The witch's relationship with nature and the seasons also meant a relationship with the cycle of life, death, and rebirth. Bringing someone back from the dead in the same body seemed to violate that cycle. Reincarnation, however, was another matter entirely. That fit the witch's worldview much better. Death was part of nature, not just another condition to fix with enough magical power.

The High Secret Order (HSO) spells were great, and many of them fit right into what I thought witch magic should be. I just had a group of spells I originally called "witchcraft" and later "hex magic." My witch was more focused on occult powers and familiars.

Sympathetic magic mattered most to me. The idea that a witch could use a lock of hair, a personal possession, a poppet, or some other object connected to a person to work her magic felt much more appropriate than simply pointing a finger and casting a spell. A witch's practice of magic should feel different, not just in the spells she can cast.

In my 2011 post, I suggested that clerics rely on faith, magic-users on intellect, and witches on personal connections and magical correspondences. A wizard might regard such things as unnecessary props, but to the witch they are part of the magic itself. This also gives the witch something distinctive to do in the game. She might need to gather ingredients, prepare a charm, or perform a ritual before a spell can take effect. These are not just trappings, this is good roleplaying.

Herbalism and alchemy were also natural fits. I had long associated witches with herbs, potions, and strange concoctions bubbling away in cauldrons. But there was also a practical design question here. How much healing could I give the witch before she started replacing the cleric? How much magical power could I give her before she became just another magic-user?

I asked these questions in 1986, and I still ask them when designing witches today.

The power of fascination was another interesting idea. Witches in folklore and fiction have always been able to beguile, charm, or otherwise influence others. Morgan le Fay and Circe came to mind, along with countless other witches from stories, television, and movies. I liked the idea of this being more than another charm spell. It was part of what made a witch a witch.

The religious aspects of witchcraft were a little more complicated. Moldvay drew on historical and anthropological interpretations of witchcraft, including Margaret Murray's work. Murray's theories about a surviving, organized pre-Christian witch-cult have long since been discredited, but they were enormously influential on twentieth-century ideas about witches, including modern Paganism and fantasy fiction. Not to mention, great for my gaming ideas.

Like Moldvay, I drew on many of those same sources. But I was also interested in the idea that a witch's relationship with the supernatural differed from a cleric's. A witch might honor gods and goddesses, work with spirits, bargain with supernatural powers, or call upon something older and stranger. Her magic could be spiritual without working the same way as clerical magic.

This eventually became an important part of my own ideas about Patrons and how witches gain and use their powers.

The two things I added to Moldvay's list in 2011, covens and ritual magic, were also missing from many early attempts at witch classes.

Witches working together are a fixture of folklore and literature, from the Weird Sisters in Macbeth to the witches of modern television. I wanted covens to mean something mechanically. Maybe three witches working together could accomplish something none of them could do alone. Maybe certain spells required a coven, or their effects grew stronger as more witches participated.

Ritual magic went hand in hand with that. Not every spell should be something a witch could cast in the middle of combat. Some magic should take time, preparation, special ingredients, and perhaps the right phase of the moon or time of year. That sort of magic was often much closer to the witchcraft I had been reading about than anything in the Player's Handbook.

Of course, these ideas weren't all fully formed in 1986. Some were little more than margin notes, or, more often, on paper bookmarks, and others were things I wouldn't find good mechanical solutions for until much later. But the foundations were there.

And that brings me back to Dragon #114.

The witch in those pages wasn't my witch. I would have handled some spells and abilities differently, and I wanted to explore ideas the article never touched on. But that was perfectly fine.

What mattered was that we approached the same problem from similar directions, used many of the same sources, and found that a witch could be something different from either a cleric or a magic-user.

Not necessarily better or more powerful. Just different.

There is a line from one of Larina's binding rituals that goes, "I bind you to me, and me to thee. I bind us with the power of three times times."

I think that fits well here. My witch and the Dragon #114 witch were never quite the same, but they have been connected for forty years. One influenced the other, and my own understanding of both has changed over time.

And I suspect that neither of them is quite finished with me yet.

"Larina" by Djinn

"If Anyone Falls"

Of course, I can't talk about Dragon #114 without talking about Larina.

I have already gone into great detail about her origins and evolution in my Mirror Mondays: The Witches of 1986 post back in July. I don't want to repeat all of that here, but something about her relationship with this particular issue of Dragon is worth exploring.

When I created Larina in July 1986, she was a witch in concept but a magic-user on her character sheet. I had my own witch class in various stages of development, but it was hardly complete. So she was a magic-user, with the understanding that she was really something else. I have a rather distinct memory of saying "I am going to play her like a witch." She wasn't the first; hell, she wasn't even my fourth witch character (well, maybe my fourth), but she was the one I explicitly called a "witch."

When Dragon #114 came along, I immediately made her a magic-user/witch. Suddenly, there were rules for something I had been trying to represent for years.

But I didn't quite appreciate then how much those rules would change the way I thought about her.

She wasn't simply a magic-user who happened to call herself a witch anymore. Her witchcraft was something distinct, something she could study and practice alongside her more conventional magical education. That distinction became part of her story.

And more importantly, it made me think about what she could do that other characters couldn't.

Larina was never going to be the most powerful combat spellcaster in the group. That wasn't what interested me about her. I wanted her to know things. I wanted her to understand the strange and mysterious, to recognize a supernatural threat when others couldn't, and to know what to do about it.

The witch class helped me explore that. But then something interesting happened.

Over the years, as I kept working on my own witch classes and playing others (Bard Games, Mayfair, AD&D 2nd ed), Larina became a kind of measuring stick for them. I could look at a new version of the witch and ask myself, "Can I make Larina with these rules?"

It was a useful question, even if it wasn't always fair. After all, not every witch should be Larina, and I'd created plenty who were nothing like her. But she represented a particular understanding of what a witch could be, and if the rules couldn't support that, then I wanted to know why.

In 1986, I was adapting Larina to fit the witch class in Dragon #114. Forty years later, I often evaluate witch classes by how well they represent her. 

So, somewhere along the way, the relationship had reversed.

And that brings me to something else.

The witch in Dragon #114 was a collection of rules. A good collection of rules, one that influenced me enormously, but rules nonetheless. Larina was the character who lived with the consequences of those rules.

She gained experience, learned new spells, met other characters, developed relationships, changed her beliefs, and survived campaigns that sometimes ended long before I wanted them to.

She eventually became a character I could play in games that had no witch class at all. The mechanics changed, sometimes dramatically. But I still knew who she was.

This taught me something about character classes that I don't think I fully understood in 1986. A class needs to be more than a collection of powers and abilities. It should help players create a particular kind of character, one with a recognizable identity and a place in the game world.

And if it does that well, the characters it helps create might eventually become something larger than the class itself.

That certainly happened with Larina.

Forty years ago, Dragon #114 helped me figure out how to play her.

Forty years later, she is still helping me figure out how to write witches.

Monday, October 26, 2026

Mirror Monday: The Women Who Made My Old School

Lately, I've been spending a lot of time looking back at the origins of my witches, both in Advanced Witches & Warlocks and in my Jackson, Illinois setting. Last time, I discussed why witches have been such an important part of my gaming and writing for nearly forty years. My fascination began with books on mythology, folklore, magic, and the supernatural, eventually finding its way into my games and the characters I created.

But no one creates these things in a vacuum.

Contributions by Women to D&D

When I look back at the books, illustrations, games, and stories that helped shape my understanding of witches, something interesting emerges. A remarkable number of the people who influenced me were women. Some were writers, some artists, some game designers, and others helped establish the hobby before many of us even knew what a roleplaying game was.

Their contributions helped define what fantasy, horror, the occult, and old-school D&D looked like to me.

More importantly, their work contributed to the mixture of ideas that eventually became my witches.

Some of these connections are obvious. Others are things I have only begun to recognize after decades of gaming, reading, and writing. And in a few cases, I discovered that someone else had been exploring the same ideas long before I knew about their work.

That seems especially appropriate for a Mirror Monday.

Margaret St Clair
The Women of Appendix N

I have been discussing Appendix N quite a bit, particularly in my Witches of Appendix N series. One thing that continues to impress me about the history of fantasy and horror is how many women helped establish the literary traditions that would eventually inspire D&D.

Gary Gygax included three women in Appendix N of the 1979 Dungeon Master's Guide: Andre Norton, Leigh Brackett, and Margaret St. Clair. All three have become increasingly important to my understanding of the history of fantasy gaming, and each has contributed something different to how I imagine witches.

Andre Norton is perhaps the most obvious connection. Her Witch World stories place witches and their magical traditions at the center of an entire fantasy setting. The witches of Estcarp are not simply another group of spellcasters. They have their own history, social structures, obligations, and relationships with the powers they command.

That is something I have tried to capture in Advanced Witches & Warlocks. A Witch needs more than a spell list and a few special abilities. She needs a magical tradition that feels as though it belongs to the world she inhabits. Norton helped demonstrate how witchcraft could be part of a culture rather than merely something an individual character practices.

I've already discussed Norton at length in my Witches of Appendix N: Andre Norton post, so I won't repeat all of that here.

Margaret St. Clair brought something different to the mixture. Her fiction, particularly Sign of the Labrys and The Shadow People, combines occult traditions with hidden realities and worlds that exist beneath or alongside our own. There are witches, secret knowledge, and supernatural forces that suggest that everyday reality is only part of a much larger and stranger existence.

That concept has become fundamental to my approach to witches. In Advanced Witches & Warlocks, occult magic is distinct from both the arcane magic of Magic-Users and the divine magic of Clerics. In Jackson, the ordinary world and the supernatural are separated by a Veil that is sometimes dangerously thin.

St. Clair didn't create those ideas for me, but her fiction belongs to the same traditions that helped me imagine them. Her occult worlds suggested that the supernatural could be an entire hidden reality, not simply a collection of monsters waiting to be encountered.

Leigh Brackett gave us something else entirely. Her Eric John Stark adventures are filled with strange civilizations, ancient powers, dangerous women, and the sort of hard-bitten action that would be perfectly at home in a sword-and-sorcery campaign.

Brackett demonstrated that a writer could create traditionally masculine pulp heroes while also populating their worlds with formidable women possessing ambitions and desires of their own.

I find that particularly important when considering the kinds of stories I want to tell. Larina, Stephanie, Faye, and the women of Jackson are not interesting because they are more powerful than the men around them. They are interesting because they are characters with their own histories, motivations, strengths, and weaknesses.

The same is true of the men.

And I shouldn't leave out C. L. Moore. Although she wasn't included in Appendix N, Moore's Jirel of Joiry stories are essential to understanding the early sword-and-sorcery tradition. Jirel was confronting supernatural terrors and venturing into strange otherworldly realms in the 1930s, long before D&D existed.

These women were not outsiders arriving later to revise an established fantasy tradition.

They were helping create it.

Margaret Brundage – Weird Tales July 1942 cover
The Women Who Gave Fantasy Its Look

Literature was only one part of the equation. The artwork mattered just as much.

When I was younger, I could spend hours looking at the illustrations in fantasy books, old pulp magazines, mythology collections, and gaming supplements. Sometimes the artwork was what drew me to a book in the first place. A single image could suggest an entire world, a character, or an adventure.

Margaret Brundage was one of the artists who helped establish the visual identity of weird fantasy and horror. During the 1930s, her covers for Weird Tales featured beautiful women, sinister sorcerers, monsters, violence, and supernatural danger. Her work could be sensual, frightening, grotesque, and provocative, often all at once.

Brundage frequently signed her paintings simply "M. Brundage," and some readers were unaware that the artist responsible for these images was a woman.

I find that rather fascinating.

The classic pulp aesthetic, with all its beauty, sexuality, danger, and occasionally outrageous imagery, was not exclusively the product of male artists. Women were helping define it, too.

I've always enjoyed those older artistic traditions. I don't think fantasy or horror needs to avoid beauty, sensuality, violence, or the grotesque. But those elements are most interesting when they contribute to a larger world or story.

For my witches, Brundage represents an important part of the visual tradition of fantasy: the combination of beauty and danger, the supernatural and the sensual, the familiar and the monstrous.

Pamela Colman Smith represents another side of that artistic heritage.

Her illustrations for the Rider-Waite-Smith Tarot, first published in 1909, helped establish one of the most recognizable visual languages of modern occultism. The High Priestess, the Magician, the Moon, and the other cards are filled with symbolism, ritual objects, colors, and imagery that suggest hidden meanings.

When I think about the symbols, tools, and imagery associated with my witches, I can see that influence. The occult should look and feel different from conventional D&D magic. A witch's tools and symbols are not simply decorations. They help communicate her relationship with the powers she studies.

It is worth mentioning that the Rider-Waite-Smith Tarot also has another connection to my work. The High Priestess, the Moon, the Queen of Swords, and other cards have become part of the symbolic language I associate with various witches, including Larina and Taryn.

Then there is Rosaleen Norton, the Australian artist and occultist often called the Witch of Kings Cross.

Norton's artwork was strange, visionary, frequently erotic, and sometimes profoundly unsettling. Her paintings and drawings explored pagan deities, spirits, supernatural beings, and occult experiences. They challenged conventional ideas about what religious or spiritual art ought to depict.

I find her work fascinating because it reminds me that the occult has never been entirely comfortable or respectable. There is something transgressive about witchcraft as it appears in folklore and fiction. Witches deal with things that other people fear, reject, or refuse to acknowledge.

That doesn't necessarily make them evil.

But it does make them interesting.

The imagery of Brundage, Smith, and Norton contributed different things to my imagination. Brundage brought the sensual danger of pulp fantasy. Smith provided a symbolic vocabulary for magic and ritual. Norton demonstrated how unsettling and otherworldly occult art could become.

None of them gave me a finished Witch class.

But all of them contributed to what I wanted witches to feel like.

The Women of Early D&D

The original Dungeons & Dragons emerged from a predominantly male wargaming culture. Gary Gygax and Dave Arneson drew upon miniature warfare, historical simulations, fantasy literature, and their own experiments with new forms of gaming.

That history is well established, and I have no interest in changing it.

But the history of D&D is larger than the handful of men whose names appear most frequently in accounts of its creation.

Women played, wrote, illustrated, designed, organized, and helped the hobby grow almost from its beginnings.

Even the Gygax household, where some of the earliest games were played, included Gary's daughters Elise, Heidi, and Cindy. Their participation in the family's gaming history is worth remembering, even if the surviving accounts of those earliest sessions are understandably incomplete.

Lee Gold began publishing Alarums & Excursions in 1975, providing one of the earliest forums for roleplaying gamers to exchange ideas, discuss rules, and develop new approaches to this strange hobby.

Jean Wells joined TSR in 1979 and contributed as a writer, editor, and designer. Her work on Sage Advice in Dragon magazine helped generations of players make sense of the rules. She also created The Palace of the Silver Princess, an adventure whose original version would become famous for being recalled and replaced.

Rose Estes helped introduce D&D to readers through the Endless Quest books, beginning with Dungeon of Dread in 1982. These books let readers make choices and experience fantasy adventures without a gaming group or a set of rules. For many, they served as an introduction to the imaginative possibilities of D&D.

Margaret Weis, working with Tracy Hickman, helped bring Dragonlance to life through novels that became enormously popular throughout the 1980s. The characters of Krynn became just as memorable as the adventures themselves, and the combination of gaming and fiction demonstrated how deeply players and readers could become invested in an imagined world.

Jennell Jaquays deserves more than a passing mention here. Her adventures Caverns of Thracia and The Dark Tower helped demonstrate just how intricate, layered, and imaginative old-school adventure design could be. Her dungeons were not simple linear sequences of rooms and encounters. They had multiple entrances, looping paths, vertical connections, competing factions, and the sense that these places existed before the player characters ever arrived. People still talk about “Jaquaying the dungeon” as shorthand for this sort of non-linear, living design, though even that phrase can feel too small for the full range of her contributions. Jennell was also a friend, which makes it even harder for me to reduce her work to a quick summary. What I can say is that she helped show me that fantasy environments should feel like places, not just encounter charts. That lesson matters in a dungeon, on a wilderness map, and even in a setting like Jackson.

And then there is Darlene Pekul, known professionally simply as Darlene.

Her 1980 World of Greyhawk map of the Flanaess is one of my favorite pieces of D&D cartography. I have spent a great deal of time studying that map over the years.

What Darlene created was more than a geographic reference. It was an invitation to explore. The kingdoms, rivers, mountains, cities, and wildernesses suggested that an entire world existed beyond whatever adventure the players happened to be experiencing.

That sense of a larger world has always been important to me.

Jackson may be a fictional Illinois town rather than a fantasy continent, but I approach it with much the same philosophy. The places exist beyond the immediate adventure. People have lives when the player characters aren't watching. The world has history, geography, and relationships that continue whether or not an adventure happens to involve them.

Darlene helped demonstrate how a setting could become a place that existed in the imagination.

These women contributed in different ways, but their work helped shape the games I grew up playing and continue to love.

Eldritch Wizardry
Eldritch Wizardry and the Possibilities of Magic

One of the earliest D&D books that helped expand my understanding of the game was Eldritch Wizardry, Supplement III for the original Dungeons & Dragons, published in 1976.

It is a remarkable little book, filled with concepts that would become important to the game's future.

Druids. Psionics. Demons. Artifacts. Powerful supernatural forces that did not fit neatly into the original game's relatively straightforward categories.

For me, these were fascinating possibilities.

Druids suggested magical traditions rooted in nature, old religions, and relationships with the living world. Psionics suggested powers of the mind, neither conventional arcane magic nor divine intervention. Demons opened the door to older, darker supernatural forces, entities whose desires and purposes might be entirely different from those of mortal characters.

All of those concepts eventually contributed to my understanding of witches.

I wanted a magical tradition that was something other than another kind of Magic-User. I wanted witches to have their own relationships with spirits, supernatural powers, ritual practices, and hidden knowledge.

Eldritch Wizardry suggested that D&D was broad enough to accommodate more than one understanding of magic.

There is also the cover.

The original Eldritch Wizardry features one of the more provocative illustrations in early D&D, a nude woman bound to what appears to be a sacrificial altar. A young woman, Deborah Larson, created the painting for the cover.

Eldritch Wizardry art credits

It's an image unlikely to appear on the cover of a major D&D release today.

But I find its place in gaming history fascinating.

Who is this woman? Why is she there? What ritual is taking place? Who is responsible? Is she a sacrifice, a captive, a willing participant, or something else entirely? And what happens when the adventurers interrupt whatever is about to occur?

Those questions interest me far more than deciding whether the image is provocative.

The artwork suggests a story, and the book's contents suggest ways that story might develop.

That's what I have always loved about old-school D&D. The books weren't necessarily the final word on anything. They offered possibilities that we could explore, reinterpret, and develop into something of our own.

I didn't need to recreate every idea in Eldritch Wizardry exactly as presented.

I needed the doors it opened.

Lee Gold and the Craft of the Wise

Lee Gold deserves more attention because her work offers an unusual connection to my own research.

Gold was already helping build the roleplaying community with Alarums & Excursions in 1975. But she was also a designer, and in 1983 she published Lands of Adventure through Fantasy Games Unlimited.

I had wanted to examine that game for years before finally acquiring a copy. When I reviewed it in 2021, I was struck by how many ideas Gold and I had explored independently.

Lands of Adventure uses Culture Packs to adapt its rules to different historical and mythological settings. The original boxed set included Mythic Greece and Medieval England, both subjects I have explored extensively in my own writing.

Her Mythic Greece material was called Children of the Gods, the same title I had independently chosen for my own treatment of Greek mythology and Classical witches.

Her Medieval England material included witches, familiars, and coven casting. Gold drew upon sources such as Robert Graves and Margaret Murray, both of whom had also influenced my research.

I had used related material when developing my own Children of the Gods and The Craft of the Wise.

The remarkable thing is that I had developed those books without knowing how Gold had approached the same subjects.

We were looking at similar historical and mythological material, asking some of the same questions, and sometimes arriving at comparable conclusions.

Now, I should point out that some of these older theories about witchcraft, particularly Margaret Murray's historical witch-cult hypothesis, are no longer accepted by mainstream historians. But their influence upon twentieth-century occultism, fantasy literature, and gaming remains an important part of the history of fictional witches.

What I find interesting is how similar our creative approaches are.

Both of us were interested in magic as something shaped by culture, history, mythology, and religious practices rather than merely a universal list of spells.

I sometimes wonder how my own Witch books might have developed differently if I had encountered Lands of Adventure earlier.

Sometimes another creator's influence is direct. Sometimes we recognize it only in hindsight, when we discover someone else had been exploring the same territory.

And sometimes looking into that mirror tells us as much about our own work as it does about theirs.

Lauralanthalasa Kanan
Laura Hickman, Laurana, and Larina

Laura Hickman deserves special mention here.

Laura and Tracy Hickman helped create some of the most memorable adventures in early D&D, including Rahasia, Pharaoh, and Ravenloft. Their work brought a strong sense of story, atmosphere, and character motivation to adventures that might otherwise have been little more than collections of encounters.

Ravenloft is particularly important to my work on NIGHT SHIFT. The original 1983 adventure helped demonstrate how Gothic horror could function within the framework of AD&D, using atmosphere, a memorable antagonist, and a setting that felt alive beyond the encounters themselves.

But Rahasia is especially relevant to my witches.

Originally created by Laura and Tracy before its eventual publication by TSR as B7 Rahasia, the adventure features three dead witches: Karelena, Solorena, and Trilena. Their spirits possess living elven women, making them something quite different from the usual villains waiting at the end of a dungeon.

I discussed them in my review of B7 Rahasia, and I have considered incorporating them into my own War of the Witch Queens campaign.

They are exactly the sort of characters who intrigue me. They have magical power, histories, ambitions, and a supernatural existence that raises all sorts of questions about death, possession, and survival beyond the grave.

They also demonstrate that memorable witches were part of early D&D adventures long before I began developing my own versions of the class.

But Laura Hickman's influence goes even deeper.

Laura inspired Lauralanthalasa Kanan, better known as Laurana, the Golden General of Dragonlance. Tracy Hickman has confirmed this connection, and it has always delighted me.

Laurana was one of my favorite characters from the original Dragonlance Chronicles. She begins as a relatively sheltered elven princess, beautiful, romantic, and deeply in love with Tanis Half-Elven. But over the course of the story, she grows into a courageous warrior, a military leader, and one of the great heroes of the War of the Lance.

She never has to abandon her femininity to become heroic. Nor does her love for Tanis prevent her from becoming someone important in her own right.

And Laurana became one of the inspirations for Larina Nichols.

The characters are very different, of course. Larina was one of my first witches in AD&D and is now a teenage witch living in 1980s Illinois, not an elven princess fighting a war against dragons. But there is a creative lineage connecting them.

Laura Hickman inspired Laurana. Laurana helped inspire Larina. And Larina has now been part of my gaming and writing for nearly forty years.

In a very real sense, Laura Hickman is Larina's spiritual grandmother.

I rather like that.

There is also something wonderfully appropriate about Laura's connection to both Ravenloft and Dragonlance. Her contributions reach into two of the areas that have become most important to my own work: Gothic horror and the development of a heroic female character who eventually helped inspire my favorite witch.

Sometimes the connections between our influences and our creations are more direct than we realize.

Candella and Duchess, caught in the act
Jean Wells, Duchess, Candella, and Jackson

There is another connection between early D&D and Jackson that I find particularly satisfying.

Jean Wells created two adventuring characters named Duchess and Candella, who appeared in her original Palace of the Silver Princess.

Duchess and Candella were thieves, and their adventures became part of my, and many others', own gaming imaginations.

More importantly, they eventually became the original inspirations for Denise Carver and Candy Mercer in Jackson.

Denise and Candy are now teenage girls living in Jackson, Illinois in 1986. They are friends, partners, and co-conspirators in every sense of the word. They have families, responsibilities, personal histories, and futures that extend decades beyond their high school years.

They are not simply copies of Jean Wells' characters. They have changed considerably as I've developed Jackson and explored who these girls are.

But the connection remains.

I especially enjoy that Denise and Candy aren't witches. Their importance to Jackson comes from their humanity, their relationships, and their willingness to stand beside their friends when the supernatural threatens their lives.

Denise, in particular, has become one of those characters whose strength comes from her convictions and her determination to protect the people she loves.

That is a long way from a pair of adventuring thieves in an early D&D module. But I can still see them in my characters, and I have Jean Wells to thank for that.

Jean Wells could never have imagined the lives Denise and Candy would eventually lead in my setting (well, I am sure she could have). But without Duchess and Candella, those characters might never have existed.

This is one of my favorite things about roleplaying games. Characters can move beyond the adventures in which they first appeared. They change, develop new relationships, acquire new histories, and become something their original creators never anticipated.

Sometimes they even find their way into entirely different games and settings.

Jean Wells also reminds us that women were actively creating D&D adventures and characters during the hobby's formative years. Their contributions weren't limited to illustrating someone else's ideas or playing supporting roles.

They were creating worlds and characters of their own.

Sometimes those characters still inspire us forty-five years later.

The Women Who Became My Witches

Looking back on these women together, I begin to see how their contributions helped shape my own vision of the witch.

Andre Norton demonstrated how witchcraft could be part of an entire society, complete with traditions, obligations, and history. Margaret St. Clair explored hidden supernatural realities and occult knowledge. Leigh Brackett and C. L. Moore gave us dangerous worlds filled with capable women, strange magic, and heroic adventure.

Margaret Brundage helped define pulp fantasy's sensual, supernatural imagery. Pamela Colman Smith gave us a visual language for occult symbolism and ritual. Rosaleen Norton demonstrated just how strange, frightening, and transgressive magical imagery could become.

Darlene Pekul helped make fantasy settings feel like real places waiting to be explored. Rose Estes introduced readers to the possibilities of interactive fantasy adventures. Jennell Jaquays demonstrated how imaginative and interconnected dungeon environments could become.

Deborah Larson created one of the most memorable early D&D covers, while Eldritch Wizardry gave me ideas about druids, psionics, demons, and the expanding possibilities of supernatural power within the game.

Lee Gold showed another way to develop magic through historical and mythological traditions, often drawing on the same sources I would use years later.

Laura Hickman helped create some memorable early D&D witches, contributed to Ravenloft's Gothic horror, and inspired Laurana, who in turn inspired Larina.

And Jean Wells created Duchess and Candella, who eventually became Denise and Candy.

None of these women created my Witch class. None of them wrote Advanced Witches & Warlocks or imagined the supernatural history of Jackson, Illinois.

But each contributed something to the mix of ideas that shaped my work.

Some of those influences were direct. Others came through books, illustrations, and games I encountered long before I knew much about the people behind them. Still others were things I discovered later, when I recognized that someone else had been exploring the same ideas independently.

That is how creative work develops.

We read. We play. We study. We borrow ideas, reinterpret them, combine them with others, and occasionally discover something entirely new.

The Witch class I began developing decades ago wasn't the product of any single influence. It emerged from mythology, folklore, history, fiction, art, religion, and gaming.

Over time, those influences became something of their own.

In Advanced Witches & Warlocks, they became rules, spells, rituals, traditions, pacts, and the distinction between occult, arcane, and divine magic.

In Jackson, they became characters who live with the consequences of possessing supernatural powers. Larina, Stephanie, Faye, Sylvia, Kiera, Natasha, and the others are not simply examples of what a Witch class can do. Their magic affects their relationships, beliefs, ambitions, fears, and choices.

And the development continues in both directions.

Sometimes a character in Jackson suggests a new rule for AW&W. Sometimes a rule or magical tradition from AW&W suggests an entirely new story for Jackson.

The two projects are constantly influencing one another, just as the literature, art, and games that preceded them continue to influence both.

The Other Side of the Mirror

It's particularly satisfying to look back at my gaming history and recognize influences I didn't always appreciate at the time.

I knew I loved the Weird Tales covers. I knew Darlene's Greyhawk map was something special. I knew the Tarot imagery fascinated me, and I knew Eldritch Wizardry offered possibilities I wanted to explore.

I knew I enjoyed the stories of Andre Norton, Leigh Brackett, and Margaret St. Clair. I knew I liked Laurana and that her character had influenced Larina. I knew Duchess and Candella had eventually become Denise and Candy.

But I didn't always stop to think about the people behind those creations or how their work connected to what I was doing.

Over the years, as I've studied the hobby's history and the literature that inspired it, I've become more interested in those creators and their contributions.

Not because I want to rewrite gaming history, but because I want to understand it more completely.

The women I've discussed here were not late arrivals to fantasy and roleplaying games. They wrote the stories, painted the artwork, designed the adventures, created the characters, and built the communities that helped establish the traditions I grew up with.

Their contributions were part of the old school from the beginning.

That doesn't diminish the contributions of Gary Gygax, Dave Arneson, Robert E. Howard, Fritz Leiber, Jack Vance, or the many other men whose work remains important to me. I still admire their contributions and find inspiration in them.

But the full history is richer and more interesting when we recognize everyone who helped create it.

I still love the old books. I still play the old games. I still write new material for them, and I continue to find inspiration in the same stories and traditions that first captured my imagination nearly fifty years ago.

I don't need to abandon any of that to recognize women's contributions to the hobby I love.

In fact, understanding those contributions helps me appreciate the old school even more.

Laura Hickman inspired Laurana, who inspired Larina. Jean Wells created Duchess and Candella, who eventually became Denise and Candy. The witches of Andre Norton and Margaret St. Clair informed my understanding of occult traditions, while the artwork of Margaret Brundage, Pamela Colman Smith, and Rosaleen Norton shaped how I imagined those traditions might look.

In a very real sense, the witches of Advanced Witches & Warlocks and the young women of Jackson have a much larger family tree than I ever realized.

And I am still discovering new branches.

Perhaps that is another thing these Mirror Mondays are teaching me. Sometimes the most interesting discoveries aren't about what has changed.

But rather what was there all along.