Episode 7: The Road to Hell
Tara: My whole life has been ‘Tara, don’t use your magic.’ ‘Tara, hide your powers.’ ‘Tara you will scare people or hurt an innocent.’ But you are not innocent are you? You tried to hurt and then kill Willow. So maybe it is time I showed everyone just how powerful I am.
- Willow and Tara: The Dragon and the Phoenix, Episode 7 "The Road to Hell"
March 15, 2003.
Saturday
Buffy must make a pact with demons to fight Leviathan. Anya is ordered to kill the Cast. The Knights of Elohim are back, this time with a Tainted Fallen with them, but not before stopping off in LA to fight Faith. A group of demons, the Mormolycia (Mormo), go to the Slayer for aid in fighting him before he ignites the Hellmouth with his Taint. Yoln has discovered the final piece of Pillager. Cast discovers that he is nothing but pure will now, his body having decayed completely away by the mad god’s Taint. D’Hoffryn orders Anya to kill the Cast to prove her loyalty to him. When she doesn’t he strips her of her power and curses Xander. Tara defeats a newly resurected Warren, but she and Willow have a big fight.
The Cast learns that Faith is dying.
Story Arc elements: The Yoln arc is moved up, the Knights are killed finally, Buffy makes a pact with a dangerous group of demons, Anya rejoins the Cast, the Bronze is destroyed, Andrew dies a horrible death screaming and crying like the little b!tch he is. Buffy’s disconnection to others is more pronounced when the Mormo demons seem to have more in common with her and even call her “sister” when they call everyone else “monkeys”. Willow begins to take more of a backseat role as the group’s magic powerhouse. Tony Foster is introduced. Giles discovers the truth about Slayers and the Watchers council.
Game design elements: Taint rules for Cinematic games, new group of demons, more on Fallen Angels, rules for curses.
Soundtrack: Chris Rea “Road to Hell”
Notes and Comments:
This one is huge. The biggest adventure to date actually takes place, game time, in the shortest amount of time. We have Warren coming back, summoned by Andrew. Warren kills Andrew and takes his skin. And believe me fewer things were more enjoyable to write than Andrew dying like a little stuck pig. Warren-in-Andrew's skin now works on getting the Knights of Elohim back into town. They have brought one of their own who is now Tainted; think of the Hulk with greasy black wings. The Knights want the Slayer, but Warren wants Willow. At the same time someone or something (Yoln) has been killing all the supernatural creatures in town looking for the last half of his sword (which Warren has). There is a scene in the begining when the cast goest to the Wharf Bar because they hear the Hellions are back. They are, or were, but when they get there they are all dead including two of the Knights.
We also introduced a new race of the demons, the Lilim. One sub-race, the Mormolycia, are a group of warrior demons, normally they all look like stunningly attractive 6ft tall women in green armor. Their true form is so horrifying that other demons fear them. The Mormo make a pact with the Slayer. They will leave each other alone in order to fight the greater threat, the Tainted Fallen and later Leviathan. Stat-wise the Mormo are Slayers. This is on purpose since it is later revealed that the progenitor of the Slayers was Lilith (see: Every Angel is Terrifying). The Mormo keep refering to Buffy as "Sister" and the others as "monkeys". Thier leader H'Cathh was once known to Anya.
The big battle happens at the Bronze. We have Warren in his Andrew suit with Bronze regulars that he has turned into zombies with some tech device. The fallen Angels. The Tainted Fallen (who is crazy) and Yoln who will fight anything not human. On the other side we have the Cast and the Mormo demons. Keeping track of all that combat was a nightmare. In the end the fallen, the tainted fallen and the zombies are killed. Yoln's head it cut off by Buffy but they discover there is nothing under the armor but pure will to live. Yoln gets up gets his sword piece from Warren and leaves. The Mormo keep their word and tell "their sister" that they will be at her side in the final battle. Tara defeats Warren with her "special power" (more on that), but she and Willow have a huge fight. Before that can get heated D'Hoffryn shows up asking Ana why she has not killed the Slayer yet, a job he gave her to do 2-3 episodes back. He strips her of her power and curses Xander to always feel her pain. Game wise this means any damage Anya takes, Xander takes as well. Images from Star Trek I have not gotten out of my head since I was a kid. During the fight the Bronze blows up, well parts of it.
Warren and Tara: this was an interesting problem. We knew he was going to have to come back to deal with the issue of Willow murdering him (we didn’t want to forget that really), but for the balance we wanted Tara to have to defeat him. Our working theory was to have Tara go all uber witch on him and show that you can be powerful but not have to resort to “dark magic” to do it. But I never liked that idea. And we went back and forth on this for a long time. In the end I made an executive choice but a bit of a compromise. Tara was going to show off some power, but only in terms of defense. Bullets melted when coming near her or bounced off and really that is the same spell she used in Episode 5. She did the one thing though that I felt was totally in character and showed that she was more powerful than the others. She forgave him. In that instant Warren lost all his anger and it was replaced by guilt and remorse. I wanted to show that being empowered did not mean having a power-up. Plus there is the other issue at hand, Adam Busch is in reality a nice guy and pretty cool. He hated playing that character and he told Whedon that killing Tara was “the stupidest thing he ever heard of”. So I was willing to cut him a break by not “playing” that character here. Warren, who the cops think is Andrew, goes to jail. Jonathan, who turned himself in at the start of the episode, is released thanks to Tara giving him the phone number of Tatsou from Episode 4. There is a truce between demons and the Slayer thanks to the Mormo (but she still gets to kill vampires). Willow and Tara are still fighting, but it is that silent sort where you are both mad but not talking. Anya and Xander are dealing with their new reality. Giles tells Buffy what he has learned about Slayers (see link above).
The cast then hears that Faith is in the hospital, she had fought Yoln, and she is going to die.
Next up. Dawn goes all Carrie and goes toe to toe with Willow as the magic powerhouse of the cast.
Friday, October 8, 2010
October Movie Reviews: Dracula Prince of Darkness 1966
For my October Reviews I have another one from the Hammer Horror Collection.
This movie is a proper Dracula sequel since it features Christopher Lee as the Count; though he never speaks a line in it. Unlike the Brides of Dracula before it, this one does not have Van Helsing.
Dracula Prince of Darkness (1966)
We are treated to a montage from Dracula (1958) of Van Helsing destroying the Count. The movie starts proper with a funeral (in my memories all Hammer Films started like this) of a young girl who we soon learn is believed to be a vampire. We are introduced to an Abbot or Monk (I was never sure of the difference) who claims she isn't and deserves a proper burial.
The scene changes to the Kents, two brothers and their wives, who are on holiday from London to travel. Our Abbot meets up with them and invites to them to stay at his abbey and warns them to stay away from Carlsbad and the castle (which does not show up on their maps).
As fate would have it, they end up there due to a broken carriage wheel and are forced to take shelter. They find the castle warm and inviting, with food laid out for four. They meet the supposed sole inhabitant of the castle, Klove. He claims he is carrying out the final wishes of his master, Count Dracula.
They stay the night and one brother follows Klove to Dracula's tomb where he is killed and his blood is used to resurrect the dead ashes of the vampire. Dracula goes after the brother's wife and vamps her.
The other brother wakes up to find his brother and wife gone. He and his wife try to leave, only to be brought back to the castle by Klove. Here Dracula and Helen attack. The escape, only to be thrown in their stolen carriage and recued by the Abbot.
The Abbot knows about vampires and claims that Dracula is their master and was killed 10 years ago (Dracula 1958). While they rest, Dracula attacks Diana and takes her while Helen is left behind to be killed by the Abbot.
Charles and the Abbot ride to Dracula's castle where they manage to kill Klove on the way and rescue Diana. Dracula is trapped on the ice surrounding his castle. The Abbot shoots the ice cause Dracula to slip into the running water and "drown".
Ok. This is an odd one. First there are no lines for Dracula. That is no big really, he had few lines in the book too. But Modern Dracula is a chatty guy-or rather we like our bad guys to be chatty. Blame it on Bond I guess.
Of course this movie is really nothing more than a proto-80's slasher flick. Replace Dracula with a psycho killer and the tourists with teens and you are set. Of course instead of four we would need six and Drac would need to kill more, but the idea is the same.
There is no Van Helsing here which is not that big of a deal really.
This is one of the first Dracula "resurrection" movies. No ceremony, just pour blood into vampire ashes and mix well. It's simple and it works. The effects for Dracula's return are great for the time and I am sure they were quite proud of how it turned out.
The movie is not bad as far as plot goes. The action is slow at times, but that is more due to the time in which is was filmed.
I can't recall if I have ever seen this one or not. Some of the older Hammer films all blurred into one in time, and it has been 25-30 years since I have seen some of these. I didn't recall anything specific about this one, so it is likely it was new to me.
This movie is a proper Dracula sequel since it features Christopher Lee as the Count; though he never speaks a line in it. Unlike the Brides of Dracula before it, this one does not have Van Helsing.
Dracula Prince of Darkness (1966)
We are treated to a montage from Dracula (1958) of Van Helsing destroying the Count. The movie starts proper with a funeral (in my memories all Hammer Films started like this) of a young girl who we soon learn is believed to be a vampire. We are introduced to an Abbot or Monk (I was never sure of the difference) who claims she isn't and deserves a proper burial.
The scene changes to the Kents, two brothers and their wives, who are on holiday from London to travel. Our Abbot meets up with them and invites to them to stay at his abbey and warns them to stay away from Carlsbad and the castle (which does not show up on their maps).
As fate would have it, they end up there due to a broken carriage wheel and are forced to take shelter. They find the castle warm and inviting, with food laid out for four. They meet the supposed sole inhabitant of the castle, Klove. He claims he is carrying out the final wishes of his master, Count Dracula.
They stay the night and one brother follows Klove to Dracula's tomb where he is killed and his blood is used to resurrect the dead ashes of the vampire. Dracula goes after the brother's wife and vamps her.
The other brother wakes up to find his brother and wife gone. He and his wife try to leave, only to be brought back to the castle by Klove. Here Dracula and Helen attack. The escape, only to be thrown in their stolen carriage and recued by the Abbot.
The Abbot knows about vampires and claims that Dracula is their master and was killed 10 years ago (Dracula 1958). While they rest, Dracula attacks Diana and takes her while Helen is left behind to be killed by the Abbot.
Charles and the Abbot ride to Dracula's castle where they manage to kill Klove on the way and rescue Diana. Dracula is trapped on the ice surrounding his castle. The Abbot shoots the ice cause Dracula to slip into the running water and "drown".
Ok. This is an odd one. First there are no lines for Dracula. That is no big really, he had few lines in the book too. But Modern Dracula is a chatty guy-or rather we like our bad guys to be chatty. Blame it on Bond I guess.
Of course this movie is really nothing more than a proto-80's slasher flick. Replace Dracula with a psycho killer and the tourists with teens and you are set. Of course instead of four we would need six and Drac would need to kill more, but the idea is the same.
There is no Van Helsing here which is not that big of a deal really.
This is one of the first Dracula "resurrection" movies. No ceremony, just pour blood into vampire ashes and mix well. It's simple and it works. The effects for Dracula's return are great for the time and I am sure they were quite proud of how it turned out.
The movie is not bad as far as plot goes. The action is slow at times, but that is more due to the time in which is was filmed.
I can't recall if I have ever seen this one or not. Some of the older Hammer films all blurred into one in time, and it has been 25-30 years since I have seen some of these. I didn't recall anything specific about this one, so it is likely it was new to me.
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Dracula: other stats
I have posted Dracula stats in the past.
Here are some links:
Big Eyes, Small Mouth 3.0
Mutants and Masterminds (2nd Ed)
Doctor Who, Adventures in Time and Space
Enjoy!
Here are some links:
Big Eyes, Small Mouth 3.0
Mutants and Masterminds (2nd Ed)
Doctor Who, Adventures in Time and Space
Enjoy!
Dracula: AD&D 1st Edition
I have been watching a lot of Dracula movies of late. That has gotten me thinking about how much of a great D&D antagonist Dracula really is.
These differ from my B/X/C stats a bit. Mostly I wrote these many, many years ago.
Count Dracula, AD&D 1st Edition
DRACULA (Vlad Tepes)
FREQUENCY: Unique
NO. APPEARING: 1
ARMOR CLASS: -1 (-4 with dexterity)
MOVE: 12”/18”
HIT DICE: 13 (103 hp)
% IN LAIR: 50%
TREASURE TYPE: G
NO. OF ATTACKS: 2 (by touch or weapon)
DAMAGE/ATTACK: 1-8 (+7)
SPECIAL ATTACKS: Blood drain*, hypnosis, +4 to hit in combat
SPECIAL DEFENSES: +1 or better weapon to hit
MAGIC RESISTANCE: 25%
INTELLIGENCE: Exceptional
ALIGNMENT: Chaotic evil
SIZE: M
PSIONIC ABILITY: 204
Attack/Defense Modes: B,C/J
S: 19 D: 17 I: 17 C: 19 W: 17 CH: 17
*Dracula drains blood at the rate of 2 CON points per attack. He must succesfully attach to the neck of his victim and drain them of blood. His touch does not drain energy levels.
Getting Dracula to your AD&D world should not really be a problem. There are the Mists of Ravenloft, various Gate spells and even the Psionic Discipline Probability Travel. The how is not as important as the why. Why would you want to bring the King of Vampires to your world?
Long ago when playing AD&D 2nd Ed in college I ran an adventure where an Atlantean Mage summoned Dracula and was promptly killed. Dracula the began his killing spree anew.
I am always looking for reasons to bring him back.
These differ from my B/X/C stats a bit. Mostly I wrote these many, many years ago.
Count Dracula, AD&D 1st Edition
DRACULA (Vlad Tepes)
FREQUENCY: Unique
NO. APPEARING: 1
ARMOR CLASS: -1 (-4 with dexterity)
MOVE: 12”/18”
HIT DICE: 13 (103 hp)
% IN LAIR: 50%
TREASURE TYPE: G
NO. OF ATTACKS: 2 (by touch or weapon)
DAMAGE/ATTACK: 1-8 (+7)
SPECIAL ATTACKS: Blood drain*, hypnosis, +4 to hit in combat
SPECIAL DEFENSES: +1 or better weapon to hit
MAGIC RESISTANCE: 25%
INTELLIGENCE: Exceptional
ALIGNMENT: Chaotic evil
SIZE: M
PSIONIC ABILITY: 204
Attack/Defense Modes: B,C/J
S: 19 D: 17 I: 17 C: 19 W: 17 CH: 17
*Dracula drains blood at the rate of 2 CON points per attack. He must succesfully attach to the neck of his victim and drain them of blood. His touch does not drain energy levels.
Getting Dracula to your AD&D world should not really be a problem. There are the Mists of Ravenloft, various Gate spells and even the Psionic Discipline Probability Travel. The how is not as important as the why. Why would you want to bring the King of Vampires to your world?
Long ago when playing AD&D 2nd Ed in college I ran an adventure where an Atlantean Mage summoned Dracula and was promptly killed. Dracula the began his killing spree anew.
I am always looking for reasons to bring him back.
October Movie Reviews: Dracula 1958
Next for my October Reviews I am moving on to what is the first of a dynasty of movies.
The Dracula from 1958 would have not been a remarkable movie. Really. The pacing is slow, the script takes a number of liberties with the Stoker tale and the play as well for that matter. But it gave us Christopher Lee as the Count and Peter Cushing as Van Helsing, and it was the first of many Hammer Horror films. Hammer almost created it's own mythology of vampires and other creatures that nearly challenges the original tales. Hammer surpass even the Universal Horror monsters in the minds of many fans, myself included. It has been years since I have seen Dracula. It was great to see it again with new eyes.
Dracula (1958)
Also sometimes called the "Horror of Dracula". This is the first of many Hammer films on Dracula and starring Christopher Lee as the Count and Peter Cushing as Van Helsing. Lee might be the quintessential Dracula, equal amounts of sinister monster and suave seducer. He might not look like his counterpart from the book, but certainly he can pull off the menace very well. Of the actors that have portrayed Dracula he might also be one of the best. This movie though is also one of the greater departures from both the book and the play. Harker is a vampire hunter working with Van Helsing. Arthur Holmwood is here and works with Van Helsing later in the tale when his daughter, Harker's fiancée, Lucy is killed and his wife Mina is attacked.
Cushing's Van Helsing is younger than most portrayals, and more "English" but he displays such a calm resolve. He is, if the comparison can be made, more like the Doctor. He knows all and anticipates the Count's moves. They are more evenly matched here than in previous films.
Christopher Lee brings a presence to the role of Dracula that was different than that of Lugosi. Where Lugosi was a suave monster, Christopher Lee's Dracula is a barely contained beast. Dressed in the veneer of a man, you know he is but one bad moment away from ripping your throat out.
This version of Dracula comes back from the dead more often than any other Dracula; which is good, cause Dracula in this movies goes down rather easily. Van Helsing uses two candle sticks to form a cross and that keeps the count at bay.
Despite all of that, there is something here. Something that shows the promise of the future Hammer films, not just the Dracula ones.
The Dracula from 1958 would have not been a remarkable movie. Really. The pacing is slow, the script takes a number of liberties with the Stoker tale and the play as well for that matter. But it gave us Christopher Lee as the Count and Peter Cushing as Van Helsing, and it was the first of many Hammer Horror films. Hammer almost created it's own mythology of vampires and other creatures that nearly challenges the original tales. Hammer surpass even the Universal Horror monsters in the minds of many fans, myself included. It has been years since I have seen Dracula. It was great to see it again with new eyes.
Dracula (1958)
Also sometimes called the "Horror of Dracula". This is the first of many Hammer films on Dracula and starring Christopher Lee as the Count and Peter Cushing as Van Helsing. Lee might be the quintessential Dracula, equal amounts of sinister monster and suave seducer. He might not look like his counterpart from the book, but certainly he can pull off the menace very well. Of the actors that have portrayed Dracula he might also be one of the best. This movie though is also one of the greater departures from both the book and the play. Harker is a vampire hunter working with Van Helsing. Arthur Holmwood is here and works with Van Helsing later in the tale when his daughter, Harker's fiancée, Lucy is killed and his wife Mina is attacked.
Cushing's Van Helsing is younger than most portrayals, and more "English" but he displays such a calm resolve. He is, if the comparison can be made, more like the Doctor. He knows all and anticipates the Count's moves. They are more evenly matched here than in previous films.
Christopher Lee brings a presence to the role of Dracula that was different than that of Lugosi. Where Lugosi was a suave monster, Christopher Lee's Dracula is a barely contained beast. Dressed in the veneer of a man, you know he is but one bad moment away from ripping your throat out.
This version of Dracula comes back from the dead more often than any other Dracula; which is good, cause Dracula in this movies goes down rather easily. Van Helsing uses two candle sticks to form a cross and that keeps the count at bay.
Despite all of that, there is something here. Something that shows the promise of the future Hammer films, not just the Dracula ones.
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
Dracula: B/X Companion
The new B/X Companion Rules give us the Greater Undead including a Greater Vampire. This is awesome since it was also something I had done back when my Expert Set was still new. Of all the Greater Vampires out there, what one is greater than Dracula himself?
Since I have been watching all the movies I figured now is a good time to see if my B/X skills are still good.
Dracula
Greater Vampire*
Armor Class: 0
Hit Dice: 18*** (135 hp)
Move: 150', 180' Flying
Attacks: 2 (or 3)
Damage: 1-10 + Special / 1-8 + life drain
No. Appearing: 1
Save As: Fighter 18
Morale: 12
Treasure Type: G+H (in lair only x2)
Alignment: Chaotic
XP: 6,000
Dracula is one of the most powerful of the greater Undead. In life he was a great warrior and now in undeath he is even stronger. Dracula can attack with claws doing 1-10 hit points of damage, if both claws hit, Dracula will then latch on with his fangs and drain blood from his victim equaling two energy levels. He prefers to only drain his prey with his fangs; his claw attacks never drain life levels (though they can if he chooses).
Dracula is quite adept with a sword or spear, but prefers to use his bare hands.
If encountered in his castle he will also have 2-20 human gypsies to serve him (treat as Fighter 1) and his three vampiric brides (treat as normal vampires). He will have double the normal treasure of his kind when encountered in his lair, but nothing on him outside of it. He wears a ring of protection +1 with the Dracula family crest on it.
As per the Vampire, Dracula is immune to sleep, charm and hold spells. HE may summon 10-100 rats (5-20 giant rats), 10-100 bats (3-18 giant bats) or 3-18 wolves (2-8 dire wolves). Dracula may shapechange into a large bat or wolf, but his hit points remain unchanged. Dracula may also regenerate 5 hit points per round as long as he has fed.
Dracula shares all the same weaknesses of other common and Greater vampires including revulsion to mirrors, holy items and garlic. Running water will destroy him, but a stake in the heart will only immobilize him. Dracula may make a "Bend Bars/Lift Gates" check to remove the stake. He must be beheaded. Dracula can also move about during the daylight hours, but prefers not too since he cannot shape change.
Since I have been watching all the movies I figured now is a good time to see if my B/X skills are still good.
Dracula
Greater Vampire*
Armor Class: 0
Hit Dice: 18*** (135 hp)
Move: 150', 180' Flying
Attacks: 2 (or 3)
Damage: 1-10 + Special / 1-8 + life drain
No. Appearing: 1
Save As: Fighter 18
Morale: 12
Treasure Type: G+H (in lair only x2)
Alignment: Chaotic
XP: 6,000
Dracula is one of the most powerful of the greater Undead. In life he was a great warrior and now in undeath he is even stronger. Dracula can attack with claws doing 1-10 hit points of damage, if both claws hit, Dracula will then latch on with his fangs and drain blood from his victim equaling two energy levels. He prefers to only drain his prey with his fangs; his claw attacks never drain life levels (though they can if he chooses).
Dracula is quite adept with a sword or spear, but prefers to use his bare hands.
If encountered in his castle he will also have 2-20 human gypsies to serve him (treat as Fighter 1) and his three vampiric brides (treat as normal vampires). He will have double the normal treasure of his kind when encountered in his lair, but nothing on him outside of it. He wears a ring of protection +1 with the Dracula family crest on it.
As per the Vampire, Dracula is immune to sleep, charm and hold spells. HE may summon 10-100 rats (5-20 giant rats), 10-100 bats (3-18 giant bats) or 3-18 wolves (2-8 dire wolves). Dracula may shapechange into a large bat or wolf, but his hit points remain unchanged. Dracula may also regenerate 5 hit points per round as long as he has fed.
Dracula shares all the same weaknesses of other common and Greater vampires including revulsion to mirrors, holy items and garlic. Running water will destroy him, but a stake in the heart will only immobilize him. Dracula may make a "Bend Bars/Lift Gates" check to remove the stake. He must be beheaded. Dracula can also move about during the daylight hours, but prefers not too since he cannot shape change.
October Movie Reviews: House of Dracula 1945
Lon Chaney Jr. returns, but not as Dracula, but as the Wolf Man.
This movie is a sequel to the House of Frankenstein and the second of the Universal "Monster Mash" movies. We have a Mad Scientist, Dracula, the Wolf Man, Frankenstein's Monster and even a hunchback. All the monsters are here and we even have an angry mob of villagers.
House of Dracula (1945)
Dracula comes to visit renowned scientist Dr. Edelmann searching for a cure to his vampirism. At the same time Larry Talbot comes looking for a cure for his lycanthropy. Oddly enough the two classic monsters never share any screen time. Along the way Talbot, in a failed suicide attempt, discovers a cave where Frankenstein's monster is buried.
Dracula attempts to seduce one of Edlemann's nurses, one he had met before, so Edlemann tryies to deal with Dracula. Dracula double crosses him and feeds him some of his own vampiric blood via the transfusion. Edlemann later manages to kill Dracula, but the blood in his veins produces an odd Jekyll and Hyde like effect.
Edlemann, in one of his moments of clarity, manages to cure Talbot, but then also slips and kills a local. The villagers attack while Edlemann is trying to revive the Monster. He kills his nurse, but is shot by an now cured Talbot and the place goes down in flames with the Monster inside.
What I thought was interesting about this one was both Dracual and the Wolf Man come to Dr. Edlemann to seek a cure. Though I am certain that Dracula had other plans, Talbot I was sure was sincere.
The hunchback was a bit of a surprise. This was not your ugly Quasimodo, but instead the attractive form of Nina, played by Jane Adams. Whiled billed as a monster, she is more of a sympathetic victim. Though our mad scientist, Edelmann, serves both that role and that of a Jekyll and Hyde.
Lon Chaney J.r is back where "he belongs" as the Wolf man and John Carirdine is taking a tour as the Count. I like Caridine as the count. He has the features and he acts like the nobleman that Dracula should be. In fact in the movie poster linked here he looks a little bit like Christopher Lee. I did enjoy seeing Dracula's top hat back.
Frankenstein's Monster is utterly wasted here and most of time he is on screen are archived footage from previous movies. Which is interesting given his "top billing". The Wolf man, like our hunchback, is more to be pitied than feared.
If you will pardon the pun, Universal's monsters were getting a little long in the tooth at this point. The next movie after this one was "Abbot and Costello Meet Frankenstein" a completely fun movie, but so far removed from horror.
Next: Hammer Time! (had to do it)
This movie is a sequel to the House of Frankenstein and the second of the Universal "Monster Mash" movies. We have a Mad Scientist, Dracula, the Wolf Man, Frankenstein's Monster and even a hunchback. All the monsters are here and we even have an angry mob of villagers.
House of Dracula (1945)
Dracula comes to visit renowned scientist Dr. Edelmann searching for a cure to his vampirism. At the same time Larry Talbot comes looking for a cure for his lycanthropy. Oddly enough the two classic monsters never share any screen time. Along the way Talbot, in a failed suicide attempt, discovers a cave where Frankenstein's monster is buried.
Dracula attempts to seduce one of Edlemann's nurses, one he had met before, so Edlemann tryies to deal with Dracula. Dracula double crosses him and feeds him some of his own vampiric blood via the transfusion. Edlemann later manages to kill Dracula, but the blood in his veins produces an odd Jekyll and Hyde like effect.
Edlemann, in one of his moments of clarity, manages to cure Talbot, but then also slips and kills a local. The villagers attack while Edlemann is trying to revive the Monster. He kills his nurse, but is shot by an now cured Talbot and the place goes down in flames with the Monster inside.
What I thought was interesting about this one was both Dracual and the Wolf Man come to Dr. Edlemann to seek a cure. Though I am certain that Dracula had other plans, Talbot I was sure was sincere.
The hunchback was a bit of a surprise. This was not your ugly Quasimodo, but instead the attractive form of Nina, played by Jane Adams. Whiled billed as a monster, she is more of a sympathetic victim. Though our mad scientist, Edelmann, serves both that role and that of a Jekyll and Hyde.
Lon Chaney J.r is back where "he belongs" as the Wolf man and John Carirdine is taking a tour as the Count. I like Caridine as the count. He has the features and he acts like the nobleman that Dracula should be. In fact in the movie poster linked here he looks a little bit like Christopher Lee. I did enjoy seeing Dracula's top hat back.
Frankenstein's Monster is utterly wasted here and most of time he is on screen are archived footage from previous movies. Which is interesting given his "top billing". The Wolf man, like our hunchback, is more to be pitied than feared.
If you will pardon the pun, Universal's monsters were getting a little long in the tooth at this point. The next movie after this one was "Abbot and Costello Meet Frankenstein" a completely fun movie, but so far removed from horror.
Next: Hammer Time! (had to do it)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)