Showing posts with label Mirror Mondays. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mirror Mondays. Show all posts

Sunday, November 1, 2026

Halloween Hangover 2026

 This Halloween was a blur. On top of my aggressive posting schedule, I was working a lot, too.

So let's see what I accomplished this past month.

Photo by Nathaniel Segovia: https://www.pexels.com/photo/close-up-shot-of-pumpkins-14134396/

October Horror Movie Marathon

My theme this month was "Small town horror," focusing on movies between 1985 and 1986. I expanded it to 1983 to 1987 to cover my high school years, and again to cover 1980 to 1989. The theme I discovered was "Horror Comes Home." I dealt with movies where the horror was largely local. You no longer went to some strange land to see horror; it came home to you, or, more often, it was already there waiting for you.

The main takeaway for me is that small towns make good horror settings because they feel familiar and safe, yet that same familiarity carries a history of secrets and old grudges, stories everyone knows but few take seriously. 

Jackson, Sunny Valley, and Carbon Vale for NIGHT SHIFT are set in just such territory. The supernatural is at its most effective when it is paired with the everyday, where one can have a Friday night football game and school on Monday while something impossible is going on three streets over.

I was also reminded of how willing 1980s horror was to be weird. These movies mixed horror with comedy, science fiction, heavy metal, teen drama, fantasy, and whatever else they could get away with. Sometimes it worked. Sometimes it absolutely did not. But even the failures could be fun. That willingness to experiment is part of what made this month enjoyable, and apparently, forty years later, I am still not done exploring it.

I am torn on my next theme. I kinda want to do a Chicago-based one, but also I want to do one where I just cover movies I have already seen and talk about here but have never given a proper October Horror Movie Marathon presence. 

ETA: I started building a list of all the horror movies I have seen that I have not reviewed here, and I am already at 50+, and I am barely out of the 1970s. 

Follow Timothy's board October Horror Movie Challenge on Pinterest.

Mirror Mondays

I wrapped up the Mirror Mondays series I started earlier this year. I am pretty pleased with the themes I explored, and the playing that took place to get to the place to explore them.

Now comes the harder part. Putting it all together into my two big projects.

Coven 13

Having put four issues of Coven 13 behind me, I would say what I like best is not any particular story or author or piece of occult lore. Rather, I like the magazine’s readiness to put all of that in one world. Witches and ghosts, werewolves and vampires, old gods, folk magic, demons, sorcerers, science fiction and Sword & Sorcery are allowed to rub shoulders here with no one making a fuss over which shelf they should be on. 

In a historical sense it puts Coven 13 in an interesting position. One has Weird Tales, Unknown Worlds, Robert E. Howard and the older pulp traditions Landis so plainly respected in its history. Before it lies the occult revival of the 70s, modern supernatural horror, and, a few years later, Dungeons & Dragons. I will not go so far as to say Coven 13 had an influence on D&D; there is no evidence for it. What these four issues make plain is that a good many of the ingredients we link to fantasy gaming were already being mixed in the same cultural stew.

Coven 13 may not have influenced D&D, but plenty suggests both were part of the same cultural zeitgeist. 

What matters more to me is that Landis returns time and again to the idea that the supernatural has a place in the modern world. The old magic did not vanish with the construction of highways, office buildings, universities and subdivisions. A ghost can take up residence in a suburban home. Your neighbor may be a witch. An old god is still under the ground. And the grimoire works even when the crossroads it refers to is now occupied by a gas station.

I suppose that is why so much of this was right away useful for Jackson and Sunny Valley. I have no desire for the supernatural to be walled off in another world. It should exist beside this one and from time to time intrude upon it. Let there be a mundane map, and one the witches know. Family stories ought to be true and folk remedies effective for reasons long forgotten. Monsters should have a history, not just Hit Dice.

Four issues is hardly a run, but they sufficed.

Coven 13 had a good idea of the supernatural world it wanted: strange and messy, modern and old, frightening and funny, and unwilling to stay in its assigned genre.

Yeah. I can use that.

When I get around to rounding up the rest of the Witchcraft & Sorcery issues, we shall see where that current leads.

Fantasy Fridays

Again this year I did "Urban Fantasy Fridays" and investigated how my Jackson kids look like in other games. I had such a blast with it, and learned a lot about the characters and the setting that I want to keep it going. I might expand it to "Universal" games like GURPS or BRP. Plus I have few more that would have fit if October had been 7-8 weeks.

So that's it for my October!

See you all here next year!

Monday, October 26, 2026

Mirror Monday: The Women Who Made My Old School

Lately, I've been spending a lot of time looking back at the origins of my witches, both in Advanced Witches & Warlocks and in my Jackson, Illinois setting. Last time, I discussed why witches have been such an important part of my gaming and writing for nearly forty years. My fascination began with books on mythology, folklore, magic, and the supernatural, eventually finding its way into my games and the characters I created.

But no one creates these things in a vacuum.

Contributions by Women to D&D

When I look back at the books, illustrations, games, and stories that helped shape my understanding of witches, something interesting emerges. A remarkable number of the people who influenced me were women. Some were writers, some artists, some game designers, and others helped establish the hobby before many of us even knew what a roleplaying game was.

Their contributions helped define what fantasy, horror, the occult, and old-school D&D looked like to me.

More importantly, their work contributed to the mixture of ideas that eventually became my witches.

Some of these connections are obvious. Others are things I have only begun to recognize after decades of gaming, reading, and writing. And in a few cases, I discovered that someone else had been exploring the same ideas long before I knew about their work.

That seems especially appropriate for a Mirror Monday.

Margaret St Clair
The Women of Appendix N

I have been discussing Appendix N quite a bit, particularly in my Witches of Appendix N series. One thing that continues to impress me about the history of fantasy and horror is how many women helped establish the literary traditions that would eventually inspire D&D.

Gary Gygax included three women in Appendix N of the 1979 Dungeon Master's Guide: Andre Norton, Leigh Brackett, and Margaret St. Clair. All three have become increasingly important to my understanding of the history of fantasy gaming, and each has contributed something different to how I imagine witches.

Andre Norton is perhaps the most obvious connection. Her Witch World stories place witches and their magical traditions at the center of an entire fantasy setting. The witches of Estcarp are not simply another group of spellcasters. They have their own history, social structures, obligations, and relationships with the powers they command.

That is something I have tried to capture in Advanced Witches & Warlocks. A Witch needs more than a spell list and a few special abilities. She needs a magical tradition that feels as though it belongs to the world she inhabits. Norton helped demonstrate how witchcraft could be part of a culture rather than merely something an individual character practices.

I've already discussed Norton at length in my Witches of Appendix N: Andre Norton post, so I won't repeat all of that here.

Margaret St. Clair brought something different to the mixture. Her fiction, particularly Sign of the Labrys and The Shadow People, combines occult traditions with hidden realities and worlds that exist beneath or alongside our own. There are witches, secret knowledge, and supernatural forces that suggest that everyday reality is only part of a much larger and stranger existence.

That concept has become fundamental to my approach to witches. In Advanced Witches & Warlocks, occult magic is distinct from both the arcane magic of Magic-Users and the divine magic of Clerics. In Jackson, the ordinary world and the supernatural are separated by a Veil that is sometimes dangerously thin.

St. Clair didn't create those ideas for me, but her fiction belongs to the same traditions that helped me imagine them. Her occult worlds suggested that the supernatural could be an entire hidden reality, not simply a collection of monsters waiting to be encountered.

Leigh Brackett gave us something else entirely. Her Eric John Stark adventures are filled with strange civilizations, ancient powers, dangerous women, and the sort of hard-bitten action that would be perfectly at home in a sword-and-sorcery campaign.

Brackett demonstrated that a writer could create traditionally masculine pulp heroes while also populating their worlds with formidable women possessing ambitions and desires of their own.

I find that particularly important when considering the kinds of stories I want to tell. Larina, Stephanie, Faye, and the women of Jackson are not interesting because they are more powerful than the men around them. They are interesting because they are characters with their own histories, motivations, strengths, and weaknesses.

The same is true of the men.

And I shouldn't leave out C. L. Moore. Although she wasn't included in Appendix N, Moore's Jirel of Joiry stories are essential to understanding the early sword-and-sorcery tradition. Jirel was confronting supernatural terrors and venturing into strange otherworldly realms in the 1930s, long before D&D existed.

These women were not outsiders arriving later to revise an established fantasy tradition.

They were helping create it.

Margaret Brundage – Weird Tales July 1942 cover
The Women Who Gave Fantasy Its Look

Literature was only one part of the equation. The artwork mattered just as much.

When I was younger, I could spend hours looking at the illustrations in fantasy books, old pulp magazines, mythology collections, and gaming supplements. Sometimes the artwork was what drew me to a book in the first place. A single image could suggest an entire world, a character, or an adventure.

Margaret Brundage was one of the artists who helped establish the visual identity of weird fantasy and horror. During the 1930s, her covers for Weird Tales featured beautiful women, sinister sorcerers, monsters, violence, and supernatural danger. Her work could be sensual, frightening, grotesque, and provocative, often all at once.

Brundage frequently signed her paintings simply "M. Brundage," and some readers were unaware that the artist responsible for these images was a woman.

I find that rather fascinating.

The classic pulp aesthetic, with all its beauty, sexuality, danger, and occasionally outrageous imagery, was not exclusively the product of male artists. Women were helping define it, too.

I've always enjoyed those older artistic traditions. I don't think fantasy or horror needs to avoid beauty, sensuality, violence, or the grotesque. But those elements are most interesting when they contribute to a larger world or story.

For my witches, Brundage represents an important part of the visual tradition of fantasy: the combination of beauty and danger, the supernatural and the sensual, the familiar and the monstrous.

Pamela Colman Smith represents another side of that artistic heritage.

Her illustrations for the Rider-Waite-Smith Tarot, first published in 1909, helped establish one of the most recognizable visual languages of modern occultism. The High Priestess, the Magician, the Moon, and the other cards are filled with symbolism, ritual objects, colors, and imagery that suggest hidden meanings.

When I think about the symbols, tools, and imagery associated with my witches, I can see that influence. The occult should look and feel different from conventional D&D magic. A witch's tools and symbols are not simply decorations. They help communicate her relationship with the powers she studies.

It is worth mentioning that the Rider-Waite-Smith Tarot also has another connection to my work. The High Priestess, the Moon, the Queen of Swords, and other cards have become part of the symbolic language I associate with various witches, including Larina and Taryn.

Then there is Rosaleen Norton, the Australian artist and occultist often called the Witch of Kings Cross.

Norton's artwork was strange, visionary, frequently erotic, and sometimes profoundly unsettling. Her paintings and drawings explored pagan deities, spirits, supernatural beings, and occult experiences. They challenged conventional ideas about what religious or spiritual art ought to depict.

I find her work fascinating because it reminds me that the occult has never been entirely comfortable or respectable. There is something transgressive about witchcraft as it appears in folklore and fiction. Witches deal with things that other people fear, reject, or refuse to acknowledge.

That doesn't necessarily make them evil.

But it does make them interesting.

The imagery of Brundage, Smith, and Norton contributed different things to my imagination. Brundage brought the sensual danger of pulp fantasy. Smith provided a symbolic vocabulary for magic and ritual. Norton demonstrated how unsettling and otherworldly occult art could become.

None of them gave me a finished Witch class.

But all of them contributed to what I wanted witches to feel like.

The Women of Early D&D

The original Dungeons & Dragons emerged from a predominantly male wargaming culture. Gary Gygax and Dave Arneson drew upon miniature warfare, historical simulations, fantasy literature, and their own experiments with new forms of gaming.

That history is well established, and I have no interest in changing it.

But the history of D&D is larger than the handful of men whose names appear most frequently in accounts of its creation.

Women played, wrote, illustrated, designed, organized, and helped the hobby grow almost from its beginnings.

Even the Gygax household, where some of the earliest games were played, included Gary's daughters Elise, Heidi, and Cindy. Their participation in the family's gaming history is worth remembering, even if the surviving accounts of those earliest sessions are understandably incomplete.

Lee Gold began publishing Alarums & Excursions in 1975, providing one of the earliest forums for roleplaying gamers to exchange ideas, discuss rules, and develop new approaches to this strange hobby.

Jean Wells joined TSR in 1979 and contributed as a writer, editor, and designer. Her work on Sage Advice in Dragon magazine helped generations of players make sense of the rules. She also created The Palace of the Silver Princess, an adventure whose original version would become famous for being recalled and replaced.

Rose Estes helped introduce D&D to readers through the Endless Quest books, beginning with Dungeon of Dread in 1982. These books let readers make choices and experience fantasy adventures without a gaming group or a set of rules. For many, they served as an introduction to the imaginative possibilities of D&D.

Margaret Weis, working with Tracy Hickman, helped bring Dragonlance to life through novels that became enormously popular throughout the 1980s. The characters of Krynn became just as memorable as the adventures themselves, and the combination of gaming and fiction demonstrated how deeply players and readers could become invested in an imagined world.

Jennell Jaquays deserves more than a passing mention here. Her adventures Caverns of Thracia and The Dark Tower helped demonstrate just how intricate, layered, and imaginative old-school adventure design could be. Her dungeons were not simple linear sequences of rooms and encounters. They had multiple entrances, looping paths, vertical connections, competing factions, and the sense that these places existed before the player characters ever arrived. People still talk about “Jaquaying the dungeon” as shorthand for this sort of non-linear, living design, though even that phrase can feel too small for the full range of her contributions. Jennell was also a friend, which makes it even harder for me to reduce her work to a quick summary. What I can say is that she helped show me that fantasy environments should feel like places, not just encounter charts. That lesson matters in a dungeon, on a wilderness map, and even in a setting like Jackson.

And then there is Darlene Pekul, known professionally simply as Darlene.

Her 1980 World of Greyhawk map of the Flanaess is one of my favorite pieces of D&D cartography. I have spent a great deal of time studying that map over the years.

What Darlene created was more than a geographic reference. It was an invitation to explore. The kingdoms, rivers, mountains, cities, and wildernesses suggested that an entire world existed beyond whatever adventure the players happened to be experiencing.

That sense of a larger world has always been important to me.

Jackson may be a fictional Illinois town rather than a fantasy continent, but I approach it with much the same philosophy. The places exist beyond the immediate adventure. People have lives when the player characters aren't watching. The world has history, geography, and relationships that continue whether or not an adventure happens to involve them.

Darlene helped demonstrate how a setting could become a place that existed in the imagination.

These women contributed in different ways, but their work helped shape the games I grew up playing and continue to love.

Eldritch Wizardry
Eldritch Wizardry and the Possibilities of Magic

One of the earliest D&D books that helped expand my understanding of the game was Eldritch Wizardry, Supplement III for the original Dungeons & Dragons, published in 1976.

It is a remarkable little book, filled with concepts that would become important to the game's future.

Druids. Psionics. Demons. Artifacts. Powerful supernatural forces that did not fit neatly into the original game's relatively straightforward categories.

For me, these were fascinating possibilities.

Druids suggested magical traditions rooted in nature, old religions, and relationships with the living world. Psionics suggested powers of the mind, neither conventional arcane magic nor divine intervention. Demons opened the door to older, darker supernatural forces, entities whose desires and purposes might be entirely different from those of mortal characters.

All of those concepts eventually contributed to my understanding of witches.

I wanted a magical tradition that was something other than another kind of Magic-User. I wanted witches to have their own relationships with spirits, supernatural powers, ritual practices, and hidden knowledge.

Eldritch Wizardry suggested that D&D was broad enough to accommodate more than one understanding of magic.

There is also the cover.

The original Eldritch Wizardry features one of the more provocative illustrations in early D&D, a nude woman bound to what appears to be a sacrificial altar. A young woman, Deborah Larson, created the painting for the cover.

Eldritch Wizardry art credits

It's an image unlikely to appear on the cover of a major D&D release today.

But I find its place in gaming history fascinating.

Who is this woman? Why is she there? What ritual is taking place? Who is responsible? Is she a sacrifice, a captive, a willing participant, or something else entirely? And what happens when the adventurers interrupt whatever is about to occur?

Those questions interest me far more than deciding whether the image is provocative.

The artwork suggests a story, and the book's contents suggest ways that story might develop.

That's what I have always loved about old-school D&D. The books weren't necessarily the final word on anything. They offered possibilities that we could explore, reinterpret, and develop into something of our own.

I didn't need to recreate every idea in Eldritch Wizardry exactly as presented.

I needed the doors it opened.

Lee Gold and the Craft of the Wise

Lee Gold deserves more attention because her work offers an unusual connection to my own research.

Gold was already helping build the roleplaying community with Alarums & Excursions in 1975. But she was also a designer, and in 1983 she published Lands of Adventure through Fantasy Games Unlimited.

I had wanted to examine that game for years before finally acquiring a copy. When I reviewed it in 2021, I was struck by how many ideas Gold and I had explored independently.

Lands of Adventure uses Culture Packs to adapt its rules to different historical and mythological settings. The original boxed set included Mythic Greece and Medieval England, both subjects I have explored extensively in my own writing.

Her Mythic Greece material was called Children of the Gods, the same title I had independently chosen for my own treatment of Greek mythology and Classical witches.

Her Medieval England material included witches, familiars, and coven casting. Gold drew upon sources such as Robert Graves and Margaret Murray, both of whom had also influenced my research.

I had used related material when developing my own Children of the Gods and The Craft of the Wise.

The remarkable thing is that I had developed those books without knowing how Gold had approached the same subjects.

We were looking at similar historical and mythological material, asking some of the same questions, and sometimes arriving at comparable conclusions.

Now, I should point out that some of these older theories about witchcraft, particularly Margaret Murray's historical witch-cult hypothesis, are no longer accepted by mainstream historians. But their influence upon twentieth-century occultism, fantasy literature, and gaming remains an important part of the history of fictional witches.

What I find interesting is how similar our creative approaches are.

Both of us were interested in magic as something shaped by culture, history, mythology, and religious practices rather than merely a universal list of spells.

I sometimes wonder how my own Witch books might have developed differently if I had encountered Lands of Adventure earlier.

Sometimes another creator's influence is direct. Sometimes we recognize it only in hindsight, when we discover someone else had been exploring the same territory.

And sometimes looking into that mirror tells us as much about our own work as it does about theirs.

Lauralanthalasa Kanan
Laura Hickman, Laurana, and Larina

Laura Hickman deserves special mention here.

Laura and Tracy Hickman helped create some of the most memorable adventures in early D&D, including Rahasia, Pharaoh, and Ravenloft. Their work brought a strong sense of story, atmosphere, and character motivation to adventures that might otherwise have been little more than collections of encounters.

Ravenloft is particularly important to my work on NIGHT SHIFT. The original 1983 adventure helped demonstrate how Gothic horror could function within the framework of AD&D, using atmosphere, a memorable antagonist, and a setting that felt alive beyond the encounters themselves.

But Rahasia is especially relevant to my witches.

Originally created by Laura and Tracy before its eventual publication by TSR as B7 Rahasia, the adventure features three dead witches: Karelena, Solorena, and Trilena. Their spirits possess living elven women, making them something quite different from the usual villains waiting at the end of a dungeon.

I discussed them in my review of B7 Rahasia, and I have considered incorporating them into my own War of the Witch Queens campaign.

They are exactly the sort of characters who intrigue me. They have magical power, histories, ambitions, and a supernatural existence that raises all sorts of questions about death, possession, and survival beyond the grave.

They also demonstrate that memorable witches were part of early D&D adventures long before I began developing my own versions of the class.

But Laura Hickman's influence goes even deeper.

Laura inspired Lauralanthalasa Kanan, better known as Laurana, the Golden General of Dragonlance. Tracy Hickman has confirmed this connection, and it has always delighted me.

Laurana was one of my favorite characters from the original Dragonlance Chronicles. She begins as a relatively sheltered elven princess, beautiful, romantic, and deeply in love with Tanis Half-Elven. But over the course of the story, she grows into a courageous warrior, a military leader, and one of the great heroes of the War of the Lance.

She never has to abandon her femininity to become heroic. Nor does her love for Tanis prevent her from becoming someone important in her own right.

And Laurana became one of the inspirations for Larina Nichols.

The characters are very different, of course. Larina was one of my first witches in AD&D and is now a teenage witch living in 1980s Illinois, not an elven princess fighting a war against dragons. But there is a creative lineage connecting them.

Laura Hickman inspired Laurana. Laurana helped inspire Larina. And Larina has now been part of my gaming and writing for nearly forty years.

In a very real sense, Laura Hickman is Larina's spiritual grandmother.

I rather like that.

There is also something wonderfully appropriate about Laura's connection to both Ravenloft and Dragonlance. Her contributions reach into two of the areas that have become most important to my own work: Gothic horror and the development of a heroic female character who eventually helped inspire my favorite witch.

Sometimes the connections between our influences and our creations are more direct than we realize.

Candella and Duchess, caught in the act
Jean Wells, Duchess, Candella, and Jackson

There is another connection between early D&D and Jackson that I find particularly satisfying.

Jean Wells created two adventuring characters named Duchess and Candella, who appeared in her original Palace of the Silver Princess.

Duchess and Candella were thieves, and their adventures became part of my, and many others', own gaming imaginations.

More importantly, they eventually became the original inspirations for Denise Carver and Candy Mercer in Jackson.

Denise and Candy are now teenage girls living in Jackson, Illinois in 1986. They are friends, partners, and co-conspirators in every sense of the word. They have families, responsibilities, personal histories, and futures that extend decades beyond their high school years.

They are not simply copies of Jean Wells' characters. They have changed considerably as I've developed Jackson and explored who these girls are.

But the connection remains.

I especially enjoy that Denise and Candy aren't witches. Their importance to Jackson comes from their humanity, their relationships, and their willingness to stand beside their friends when the supernatural threatens their lives.

Denise, in particular, has become one of those characters whose strength comes from her convictions and her determination to protect the people she loves.

That is a long way from a pair of adventuring thieves in an early D&D module. But I can still see them in my characters, and I have Jean Wells to thank for that.

Jean Wells could never have imagined the lives Denise and Candy would eventually lead in my setting (well, I am sure she could have). But without Duchess and Candella, those characters might never have existed.

This is one of my favorite things about roleplaying games. Characters can move beyond the adventures in which they first appeared. They change, develop new relationships, acquire new histories, and become something their original creators never anticipated.

Sometimes they even find their way into entirely different games and settings.

Jean Wells also reminds us that women were actively creating D&D adventures and characters during the hobby's formative years. Their contributions weren't limited to illustrating someone else's ideas or playing supporting roles.

They were creating worlds and characters of their own.

Sometimes those characters still inspire us forty-five years later.

The Women Who Became My Witches

Looking back on these women together, I begin to see how their contributions helped shape my own vision of the witch.

Andre Norton demonstrated how witchcraft could be part of an entire society, complete with traditions, obligations, and history. Margaret St. Clair explored hidden supernatural realities and occult knowledge. Leigh Brackett and C. L. Moore gave us dangerous worlds filled with capable women, strange magic, and heroic adventure.

Margaret Brundage helped define pulp fantasy's sensual, supernatural imagery. Pamela Colman Smith gave us a visual language for occult symbolism and ritual. Rosaleen Norton demonstrated just how strange, frightening, and transgressive magical imagery could become.

Darlene Pekul helped make fantasy settings feel like real places waiting to be explored. Rose Estes introduced readers to the possibilities of interactive fantasy adventures. Jennell Jaquays demonstrated how imaginative and interconnected dungeon environments could become.

Deborah Larson created one of the most memorable early D&D covers, while Eldritch Wizardry gave me ideas about druids, psionics, demons, and the expanding possibilities of supernatural power within the game.

Lee Gold showed another way to develop magic through historical and mythological traditions, often drawing on the same sources I would use years later.

Laura Hickman helped create some memorable early D&D witches, contributed to Ravenloft's Gothic horror, and inspired Laurana, who in turn inspired Larina.

And Jean Wells created Duchess and Candella, who eventually became Denise and Candy.

None of these women created my Witch class. None of them wrote Advanced Witches & Warlocks or imagined the supernatural history of Jackson, Illinois.

But each contributed something to the mix of ideas that shaped my work.

Some of those influences were direct. Others came through books, illustrations, and games I encountered long before I knew much about the people behind them. Still others were things I discovered later, when I recognized that someone else had been exploring the same ideas independently.

That is how creative work develops.

We read. We play. We study. We borrow ideas, reinterpret them, combine them with others, and occasionally discover something entirely new.

The Witch class I began developing decades ago wasn't the product of any single influence. It emerged from mythology, folklore, history, fiction, art, religion, and gaming.

Over time, those influences became something of their own.

In Advanced Witches & Warlocks, they became rules, spells, rituals, traditions, pacts, and the distinction between occult, arcane, and divine magic.

In Jackson, they became characters who live with the consequences of possessing supernatural powers. Larina, Stephanie, Faye, Sylvia, Kiera, Natasha, and the others are not simply examples of what a Witch class can do. Their magic affects their relationships, beliefs, ambitions, fears, and choices.

And the development continues in both directions.

Sometimes a character in Jackson suggests a new rule for AW&W. Sometimes a rule or magical tradition from AW&W suggests an entirely new story for Jackson.

The two projects are constantly influencing one another, just as the literature, art, and games that preceded them continue to influence both.

The Other Side of the Mirror

It's particularly satisfying to look back at my gaming history and recognize influences I didn't always appreciate at the time.

I knew I loved the Weird Tales covers. I knew Darlene's Greyhawk map was something special. I knew the Tarot imagery fascinated me, and I knew Eldritch Wizardry offered possibilities I wanted to explore.

I knew I enjoyed the stories of Andre Norton, Leigh Brackett, and Margaret St. Clair. I knew I liked Laurana and that her character had influenced Larina. I knew Duchess and Candella had eventually become Denise and Candy.

But I didn't always stop to think about the people behind those creations or how their work connected to what I was doing.

Over the years, as I've studied the hobby's history and the literature that inspired it, I've become more interested in those creators and their contributions.

Not because I want to rewrite gaming history, but because I want to understand it more completely.

The women I've discussed here were not late arrivals to fantasy and roleplaying games. They wrote the stories, painted the artwork, designed the adventures, created the characters, and built the communities that helped establish the traditions I grew up with.

Their contributions were part of the old school from the beginning.

That doesn't diminish the contributions of Gary Gygax, Dave Arneson, Robert E. Howard, Fritz Leiber, Jack Vance, or the many other men whose work remains important to me. I still admire their contributions and find inspiration in them.

But the full history is richer and more interesting when we recognize everyone who helped create it.

I still love the old books. I still play the old games. I still write new material for them, and I continue to find inspiration in the same stories and traditions that first captured my imagination nearly fifty years ago.

I don't need to abandon any of that to recognize women's contributions to the hobby I love.

In fact, understanding those contributions helps me appreciate the old school even more.

Laura Hickman inspired Laurana, who inspired Larina. Jean Wells created Duchess and Candella, who eventually became Denise and Candy. The witches of Andre Norton and Margaret St. Clair informed my understanding of occult traditions, while the artwork of Margaret Brundage, Pamela Colman Smith, and Rosaleen Norton shaped how I imagined those traditions might look.

In a very real sense, the witches of Advanced Witches & Warlocks and the young women of Jackson have a much larger family tree than I ever realized.

And I am still discovering new branches.

Perhaps that is another thing these Mirror Mondays are teaching me. Sometimes the most interesting discoveries aren't about what has changed.

But rather what was there all along.

Monday, October 19, 2026

Mirror Monday: Why Witches?

John William Waterhouse - Magic Circle
 I have been writing about witches for a very long time. Anyone who has followed this blog for more than a few weeks probably knows that. Between Advanced Witches & Warlocks, NIGHT SHIFT, and my Jackson, Illinois, setting, witches occupy a considerable amount of my creative time. They have been part of my gaming life for nearly forty years, and I don't expect that to change anytime soon.

But why witches?

It is a fair question, and one I have asked myself (and have been asked) more than once over the years. Why have I devoted so much time to creating a Witch class for *D&D? Why do witches feature so prominently in my horror games? And why, when I decided to return to the Illinois of my teenage years and create a fictional town filled with supernatural mysteries, did I place a teenage witch named Larina Nichols at its center?

I think the answer goes back further than my games.

The Witch in the Library

My local public library was a second home of sorts when I was younger. I would make my way from one shelf to the next, book in hand, driven by a fascination with the supernatural: mythology, folklore, monsters, vampires, and ghosts. I read anything that put itself in front of me if it held out the promise of some kind of mystery.

Witches in particular held my attention. They had a way of occupying several worlds at once. You had the ones from folklore who were objects of fear and persecution; you had the literary variety, ranging from fairy tale villains to the great sorceresses of myth. And then there were those who actually made witchcraft part of their spiritual practice. Not to mention the ones I wanted to portray in a game of Dungeons & Dragons.

I found myself trying to reconcile these disparate notions. Some were at odds with one another or with my own beliefs, while others appeared to be different takes on the same fundamental ideas of power, nature, and knowledge. Reading and making sense of all this was how I came to think about witches. The notion arose in me that would later give birth to an in-game quote:

Morgan: There are things man was not meant to know, Nichols.
Larina: That's ok. I'm a girl. 

Larina, in my Jackson setting, is fond of the same reading material, poring over works on religion and magic to better understand her Wiccan faith and her own gifts. We put that knowledge to different uses. I was putting together an AD&D character and a magic system; she was forming an idea of where she stood in the world. Yet for all that, our methods were much the same. You will see why I have dubbed these Mirror Mondays.

The Witch Is Not the Wizard

I have long been of the opinion that a D&D witch should not be a distaff Magic-User or a cleric with better eyeliner. The Magic-User is concerned with the arcane; the Cleric has his divine power. But the Witch, as I have come to see her, is engaged in something else entirely. Her's is an occult art, one that is tied to spirits and hidden things and the relationships between them.

A Magic-User may know the right formula for an effect, and a Cleric can make his petitions to a higher authority. A Witch has to know what she is up against and what might be required of her in return. It is a more complicated business, and it has to be if she is to stand apart from the rest of the established classes in AD&D. Those distinctions are what allow for good storytelling. After all, magic ought to have its consequences. It is not merely a set of convenient skills on a character sheet. The risk is not always in a failed spell. Sometimes the problem is that something answers you.

The Witches of Jackson

With the development of Jackson, Illinois, and a return to Larina Nichols, I put the Witch in a new light.

In *Advanced Witches & Warlocks*, the questions were of an AD&D nature: what are her abilities, how does she advance? In Jackson, I was after the meaning of being a witch. What is it like to be sixteen in 1986 in a small Midwestern town and find out the supernatural is real? To see what others cannot? To have the monsters at your school or down the street rather than in some dungeon or a haunted castle in the Carpathians? Or to be the object of fear for being different?

Larina, Stephanie, and Faye are all witches, but they are not cut from the same cloth. Larina wants to understand. Stephanie is ambitious and confident in her power. Faye has older, stranger ties to the occult. I find their differences far more compelling than any common ground.

The same holds for the older set in Jackson. Sylvia, Kiera, and Natasha may have the power and knowledge to spare, but it has not made them happy or wise, nor has it made them particularly adept at getting along. You will find a past between them that is littered with unchangeable decisions.

Then there is Nida, and she has no desire to have anything to do with magic. And Vera who has been forbidden by her family to practice it.

In these characters, I can get at things a class description on its own never could. To say one has power is not to say what they will make of it. It does not indicate whether they will be kind or cruel, brave or frightened, generous or selfish. That is a question of character, not of the class they belong to.

Witches, Women, and Power

Witches have an aspect to them that has long held my interest. In fiction and in folklore, they are an odd mix of power, independence, knowledge, and femininity. They can be villains or heroes. Or they can be frightening for the simple reason that they will not behave as others expect of them.

I have never been one to think a woman of power has to shed her femininity to be taken seriously, nor do I see femininity as a synonym for weakness or passivity. Larina might be romantic and compassionate, or stubborn and terrifying. Stephanie is quite happy to be the center of attention in fine clothes and still be a formidable witch. Faye can be dangerous and vulnerable at once. None of them are, by any definition, "weak."

They can be wrong too, which is something I consider vital. I am not interested in characters who are put there to show how admirable or just how powerful they are. I want ones with flaws, who disagree and occasionally make a mess of things. The men in my stories are no different; a strong female doesn’t need a weak male counterpart any more than he needs the women around him to be helpless. There is room for all of them in fantasy and horror. Rowan, for example, is quite powerful in her own right, and she adores Andy. He is her rock, her bit of reality.  Valentino is also very capable. In one of his first adventures, he body-slams a zombie, and he also loves and protects Ami, even though she is every bit as capable as he is. These two complement each other.  Masculinity and femininity aren't competing resources.

One of the things I enjoy most about writing witches is that I don't have to limit them to any single definition of femininity. My witches can be beautiful, glamorous, romantic, sexual, maternal, ambitious, independent, or frightening. Often they are several of those things at once. They can wear elegant dresses and high heels, carry swords, summon demons, fall in love, raise families, and occasionally make decisions that shake the foundations of reality.

I have never understood why any of those qualities should be mutually exclusive. A woman doesn't become less feminine because she is powerful, nor does she become less powerful because she enjoys traditionally feminine things. Larina, Stephanie, and Faye are very different women, and I wouldn't want them any other way. They have their own personalities, interests, ambitions, and faults. Most importantly, they have their own choices to make.

Of course, not all my witches are good people, and even the good ones can do terrible things. Natasha Wilcox is one of the most intelligent and accomplished witches in Jackson, but that doesn't make her compassionate. Sylvia has paid dearly for some of her choices. Larina herself is perfectly capable of allowing her convictions to get in the way of understanding someone else's suffering. I don't need these women to be perfect, and I certainly don't need them all to agree with one another. Their disagreements, failures, and contradictions are part of what makes them interesting. Being a witch grants them access to power, not a monopoly on wisdom.

To me, that is what makes a character interesting. Not whether she conforms to someone else's expectations of what a woman should be, but whether she feels like a person who exists beyond the pages of the character sheet.

The Witch and the Monster

Horror has always had an interesting relationship with witches, often casting them as monsters. The charge of witchcraft was historically ruinous. In our stories, they have been cast as evil’s servants or wise healers, embodying generations of fear of the forbidden and of those who don’t fit in.

But being a witch doesn’t make my characters into monsters of their own accord. They might become so by what they do, by making a bad bargain or seeking power at too high a price. Or they may come across something in themselves they don’t like. But that is about action, not nature.

For Jackson, the distinction is key. The town has its share of the supernatural, but also plenty of human prejudice and anxiety. Those ordinary failings can be just as harmful as the monsters, and the witches have to deal with both.

There is also something wonderfully transgressive about the witch as a character. Witches are frequently associated with forbidden knowledge, dangerous bargains, ancient powers, and things that polite society would prefer not to acknowledge. Their stories can be bloody, violent, grotesque, sexually charged, and deeply disturbing. I don't shy away from any of that in my games. These elements are part of the long traditions of fantasy and horror that I love.

And I don't believe the presence of blood, gore, sex, or monsters automatically makes a story better. Those things are tools, and like any tools, their effectiveness depends on how they are used. A witch bargaining with a demon can be frightening because of the demon's appearance, but the real horror might lie in what she has promised in return. A monster can tear someone apart, but sometimes the more interesting question is why it chose that particular victim.

I don't see these darker elements as belonging to men or women. They belong to horror. And horror, like fantasy, has always benefited from writers and characters who bring different experiences and perspectives to it.

Tabletop Witches Don't Have to Be One Thing

Another thing I love about tabletop roleplaying games is the extraordinary freedom they give us to create. There is room for dark fantasy, heroic adventure, Gothic horror, cosmic terror, sword-and-sorcery, and just about anything else we can imagine. Not every game needs to appeal to everyone, and I certainly don't expect everyone to share my particular fascination with witches. But if you do, I'd love to hear from you!

I have always been fascinated by the assumption that fantasy gaming belongs to a particular kind of person or that there is only one proper way to approach it. I came to D&D through a lot of the same books, rules, and traditions that inspired so many other gamers of my generation. I loved the combat, the monsters, the dangerous dungeons, and the strange worlds waiting to be explored. But I was just as fascinated by the magic, mythology, folklore, and characters who didn't fit neatly into the traditional heroic mold. The old wizard, the wise cleric, the heroic paladin, and the mysterious witch were all on equal footing to me.

For me, none of these things were contradictory. They were all part of the same wonderful hobby. I didn't have to choose between Conan and Circe, between fighting monsters and studying magic, or between writing about powerful warriors and powerful sorceresses. Those interests complemented one another, and they still do. 

My love of witches didn't take me away from old-school gaming. It took me deeper into it.

But I have never believed that someone else's enjoyment of the hobby diminishes my own. There is nothing preventing me from playing AD&D the way I played it in the 1980s, or from creating something new that draws upon those same traditions. The fact that other people might prefer different characters, stories, or playstyles doesn't make my games any less meaningful.

I want more people to discover these old games and the literature that inspired them. I want them to read Appendix N, explore the old rules, and find something that excites their imaginations. They might discover the same things I did, or they might see possibilities I never considered. Either way, the hobby is richer for their participation.

I've spent far too many years exploring fantastic worlds to believe there is only one correct way to enjoy them.

Photo by cottonbro studio: https://www.pexels.com/photo/woman-in-black-long-sleeves-dress-holding-a-mirror-and-a-lighted-candle-5435264/
The Two Sides of the Mirror

Working on Advanced Witches & Warlocks and on Jackson, I have come to see how much the two feed off each other. A rule I put down for AW&W clarifies what Larina and the rest are up to. An adventure from Jackson makes me re-examine what an ability means to the one who has it. A character will point out a flaw in the rules, or a new rule will introduce a role-playing element I hadn’t considered.

I will be the first to admit that, even after forty years, I can look at one of my own creations and learn something new from her that I didn’t know before. And I don’t see that ending soon.

I don't write about witches because I want to change what fantasy gaming is supposed to be. I write about witches because they have always been part of the fantasy, horror, and folklore I love. I don't see them as alternatives to the warriors, wizards, clerics, and rogues who have populated my games for decades. I see them as part of the same rich tradition. There is room in my games for Conan and Circe, for Bram Stoker and Mary Shelley, for ancient sorceresses and teenage witches trying to survive high school. 

There always has been.

There are mysteries out there beyond the familiar world, and more to be said about what people do when they find them. I suppose that is why I am drawn back to witches' time and again. They let me get at the unknown, the very things that pulled me into gaming and mythology in the first place.

In some ways, I am still that boy in the library hunting for a book on witches. Only now am I the one writing the books, and I am still finding new ones.

Monday, October 12, 2026

Mirror Mondays: When the Mirror Becomes a Door

 Back in May, when I put out the first of my Mirror Monday pieces, I was preoccupied with two projects: Advanced Witches & Warlocks and Jackson, IL. I called that first post "Two Books, One Spell," and it was highly appropriate. I still think it is a pretty good description of what I was doing. One book was about what the Witch should look like in AD&D. The other was about what it would actually be like to be a witch, particularly a teenage witch, in 1986.

I made the case then that the two were informing each other. If anything, the case is stronger today.

Mirrors. AD&D and NIGHT SHIFT

The fundamental question for each remains unchanged: what does a witch look like through a 1986 lens? With Advanced Witches & Warlocks, I am after the kind of Witch class and occult mechanics that would have been at home with the AD&D books I was running back then. With Jackson, I take Larina, Stephanie, Faye, and company, and consider their type of witchcraft: the old school building is your dungeon, the road out of town is the wilderness, and a curious volume from the library is all the occult knowledge you have.

Those sound like very different questions and lines of inquiry. They are not.

Two Books, One Spell, Again

My job on Advanced Witches & Warlocks is to put on my old-school game designer hat. What sets the Witch apart from a Druid or an Illusionist? What are her spells and her limitations? How do you handle covens, pacts, rituals, and familiars? AD&D demands answers, if not always perfectly drawn ones. But *I* need to be able to say how something works or why the witch can’t do it. The distinction between her magic and the Arcane or Divine must be more than just something in my notes.

Jackson allows for some ambiguity, which is often preferable in horror. Larina has no use for the percentage odds of a ritual’s success. There is no spell list on Stephanie’s character sheet when she steps in front of a friend to shield them from danger. And Faye doesn’t care to know which page of the rulebook details what the Blackthorne Hags have done to her soul.

But I do need to know. Or have some idea of it, at any rate.

In that respect, Advanced Witches & Warlocks has been of great service to me in writing Jackson. It compels me to get under the hood of the supernatural. Where is the power coming from? Why can one witch do what another can't? Is it inherited or given? What are the terms of a bargain with something beyond her? Jackson can let the characters wonder about such things while the other project makes me think about what is going on behind the curtain.

Then again, the dynamic is not one way.

What Jackson Has Taught My Witches

This has been a big one. I am not sure I can adequately capture what I have learned over the last few months. 

I have been at this long enough to have written witches for most of my life, longer than some of my readers have been around. Over the years, I have put pen to paper (or, more to the point, fingers to keyboards) for Basic-era games, AD&D, d20, Unisystem, NIGHT SHIFT, and many others in between. In the course of that work, I have produced Witch classes, traditions, spells, and monsters; I have written Witch Queens and more than my share of demons, enough to last a few lifetimes.

Jackson keeps reminding me that witches are people.

It is a painfully obvious statement, but one game design has a habit of making you overlook. It is all too simple to view a Witch as a collection of class abilities: at this level she has this spell, at that one she has those restrictions on her magic items, and so on. When I am crafting an AD&D-compatible class, these details are vital, yet they say little about who she is.

Jackson makes me deal with the questions in a different order.

Who was her teacher? Who can she trust? And when things go horribly wrong, who does she call? What does she make of her own magic? What is her friends' reaction when they are afraid of what she is capable of, or, worse, how does she handle being afraid of it herself?

I have let some of those considerations seep back into Advanced Witches & Warlocks. A coven is no longer just an organization bestowing abilities; I think about what it means for a witch to have a place to belong. Pacts have real consequences rather than simply being a way to "gain power X." And a familiar is a relationship, not a list of bonuses with fur.

Jackson has been adept at getting me to consider why a Witch would act a certain way, not merely if the rules permit it. The reverse is true as well. Putting together the AD&D Witch has made me examine Jackson with a critical eye. Larina, Stephanie and the rest cannot do as they please because "witchcraft" demands it. If anything can happen at any moment, magic ceases to be magical and is little more than an excuse. There is value in limits and costs; they give weight to a choice.

The two projects end up correcting one another.

And so to Land of Confusion.

Welcome to the Land of Confusion

I have mentioned the Land of Confusion adventure before; if somewhat obliquely. The basic idea is exactly the sort of thing that happens when I am left unsupervised with my own characters for too long. With my villain Darren's help, the folks from Jackson have been transplanted into a proper Dungeons & Dragons world.

Yes. As in "Hey, look, A Dungeons & Dragons ride!"

Not some D&D-ified version of Jackson with orcs out by Sal’s Pizza. An actual fantasy world.

In that sense, Land of Confusion is the most straightforward crossover I have done between Jackson and Advanced Witches & Warlocks. I have taken people built to confront supernatural horror in 1986 small-town Illinois and put them where the assumptions of AD&D are fact.

This creates a problem I find absolutely irresistible.

Strip away Jackson Public High School, Paula’s Book Store, Strawberry Fields, the telephones, and the cassette tapes, and what is left of Larina Nichols? Or Stephanie, for that matter? Rowan? Vera? Candy?

The easy answer is to convert their character sheets. I mean, many of these characters began as D&D characters. Give them classes, assign some ability scores, figure out their equipment, and move on. I am doing all of that, naturally. I am a game designer. Stat blocks are one of the ways I amuse myself. But the easy answer is not the interesting one.

What I want to know is what makes the journey through the mirror.

When the Reality of Magic Is Common Knowledge

I find there is a certain distinction that is worth noting. In Jackson, magic is kept under wraps. You could say it is not the best-kept secret in some quarters, but for the most part people live their lives with the firm belief that witches and demons and the like are figments of the imagination. Should something odd occur, social mores will see to it that an alternative explanation is found. It is, in every sense of the word, Occult.

This is what gives Jackson its character; the inhabitants are privy to truths the rest of the world is not.

Put those same characters in an AD&D setting and the dynamic changes. Everyone is aware of magic. The fellow at the tavern table next to you could be a bona fide Magic-User. The priest in his temple has the power to heal with a touch. An old woman on the edge of the village might curse you if she is so inclined. There are monsters in the woods, and the local lord would have no qualms about publically putting a price on their heads for any adventurer willing to do the job.

Which raises the question: what is it that makes Larina stand out?

It is a good question, and one that brings to mind Advanced Witches & Warlocks. If my Witch is just another spellcaster she will be indistinguishable in a fantasy world teeming with them. She needs to be different, not more potent, not more knowledgeable, but certainly different. One finds that in the pacts, the rituals, the traditions, and the kind of old magic that does not belong in a Cleric’s church or a Magic-User’s tome.

In Jackson, these things set her apart from the common world. In D&D, they set her apart from her peers.

The witch is the same, only the mirror is different.

Consequently, Land of Confusion is evolving into something of a stress test for both endeavors, rather than simply an opportunity to put fantasy versions of my Jackson NPCs. I have to be able to explain what makes her a Witch in an AD&D context, as well as in Jackson. Or if an ability in Advanced Witches & Warlocks works on paper but is not something Larina would ever put to use, then I need to re-examine it. The rules put the characters to the test and vice versa.

1986 Through the Looking Glass

Somehow this always leads me back to 1986.

There was a reason for choosing that year for both projects. It is an interesting juncture in D&D history and in my own. AD&D was well established yet in flux. Rules were being added. Some of the original designers were out. Locally, we call the post-Unearthed Arcana era AD&D 1.5 (note: Not then, but now). I was busy playing the game and making up characters, devouring any horror or fantasy I could find, taking in the movies and the music and all manner of ideas without any inkling which ones would be with me forty years down the line.

Larina herself is a product of that time. A character made for AD&D in the eighties (July 1986) became the teenage witch of Jackson, Illinois in 1986. Now I am sending that girl back into a D&D world. I could not have planned that in 1986 if I had tried.

Then again, Land of Confusion is not an exercise in determining which Larina is real. I have long since let go of such concerns. The one in AD&D and the one in Jackson are both Larina, shards of the same concept fashioned by different games and even different versions of myself. My characters were always a bit of a psychological experiment.

Placing the Jackson version in a D&D world does not make her the AD&D character.  It doesn't even make her the younger version of that character. That would be too simple. I want to see what happens when the girl from Jackson is forced to be an adventurer. That is where the fun is.

With all these "looking glass" metaphors, I can't help but think I need a character named Alice. Or Brandy. ETA: I figured out who Alice and Brandy are.

The Mirror Opens

Mirror Mondays began with the mirror as a metaphor. On one side was Advanced Witches & Warlocks, on the other Jackson. I could look at the Witch in one and see something of value reflected from the other.

Over the last few months, that has become less metaphorical than I expected.

My work on Jackson has altered how I view the witches in Advanced Witches & Warlocks, while the latter has provided a way to understand the behind-the-scenes workings of Jackson. Answer a question for one project, and I seem to spawn two for the other.

Land of Confusion is where they meet.

What started as a reflection between the fantasy witch and the teenager is now seeing one of them cross over.

The mirror was never just a mirror.

It's more of a door.

Monday, October 5, 2026

Mirror Mondays: The Past is a Foreign Country

Tourism in Jacksonville???
I recently went back to my old hometown of Jacksonville, IL, to visit my mom and dad. My dad is 96 and will be 97 in just under two months. He is doing pretty well, if you ask me. But this was also my first trip back to Jacksonville since my Jackson project had taken full steam.

Jacksonville of 2026 is not the same as Jacksonville of 1986. And neither is the same as Jackson, IL, of 1986.

But if you look hard enough, you will see the similarities.

The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there.

Jacksonville is trying very hard to improve its image. So they are rebuilding the downtown area. Bringing in new shops, restoring buildings.

But they have a long way to go. This is not really uncommon for towns of this size in Illinois. We see it in nearby Ottawa, IL. It's about the same size, same sorts of history, and there is a booming tourist trade. Same with Woodstock, IL, and Long Grove, IL. So I think Jacksonville is doing all the right things; they just need what a lot of places need. More money.

Jacksonville, IL is an old town. Established in 1825, it has some history. This also gives me a good excuse to say Jackson was established in 1827, or whenever I publish, to say it was 200 years ago. But that age is showing. Buildings that were merely old back in 1986 look positively ancient and run-down now. I found a tree I used to play around, and the bark is completely white. The places I used to hang out are gone; new ones have taken their place.  Some things are the same. A lot is different. But I will say that this newfound desire for the town to explore its own history is making my job here a lot easier. The image above provided some good research material, and I picked all of that up at my hotel.

Jacksonville of 2026 is not the same place as Jacksonville of 1986. Buildings have disappeared. Businesses have changed. Roads and commercial development have altered how people move through town. Especially in the downtown. Trees have grown or vanished. Signs, parking lots, lighting, storefronts, cars, clothing, and dozens of things tell you that you are looking at 2026. The people are different too. 

The real Jacksonville of 1986 also isn't Jackson. Jackson is deliberately a mirror.

All The World's A Stage

Jackson is like a model I am kitbashing. I have all the pieces to say the Enterprise A and D, but what I am building is something more akin to a ship from the same period as the Enterprise A, but it is really the USS Challenger. And...this is something I am actually doing, so this analogy feels really right to me, even if it might not be all that clear to you, the reader. Sorry. 

I have a stage (Central Illinois), I have the set (Sal's Pizza, Jackson Public High, MacAlister College, Oak City), and I have my supporting characters (Larina, Stephanie, Rowan, Andy); I am just missing those all-important lead characters. That's you, by the way. The people who will pick this up and move forward.

But the "kits" I bought to build this stage are all labeled "Jacksonville." And the pieces are "Leo's Pizza," "JHS," "MacMurry College," and "Elm City." I am just reassembling them. But these pieces have been in storage for 40 years, and my instructions are a combination of old, faded instructions (memory) and new instructions for the newer models I find online (the real Jacksonville of 2026).  

So...my stage looks different. It is built from memory. That is not just fine. That's good world-building.

Leo's Pizza in Jacksonville, ILSal's Pizza in Jackson, IL

It means I have something as a placeholder (memory) until I can get more creative with it. 

But not everything in Jackson is coming from Jacksonville, and not everything is coming from the 1980s

Renee Sylvi Jäneläinen is based on a couple of people I knew, one of the (many) Rhiannon's from my AD&D games, and the oft-mentioned but so-far-never-seen Renee of Renee's Tea Shoppe. 

I wanted to bring Renee's Tea Shop over to Jackson, but I was very recently reminded why that would not work in Jackson of 1986. First, I wanted Renee as a teenage foreign exchange student. Secondly, I was sitting in an upscale coffee shop in Jacksonville last weekend (Elm City Roastery) and telling my wife how I would have killed for a place like this 40 years ago, but it never would have worked because that is not where Jacksonville "was" back then. I mentioned the tourism above, and Elm City Roastery is exactly one of the things that make Jacksonville of 2026 work. So Renee's Tea Shoppe has to wait. 

"Strawberry Fields" as a record store, and a maybe-it-is, maybe-it-isn't head shop is based on a very real place. Penny Lane in nearby Springfield, IL. But Penny Lane was important because it was where I could get records I couldn't find in Jacksonville. And there was the appeal of going somewhere "forbidden."  

But there is also more. 

Jackson remembers things Jacksonville never experienced. It remembers the Crimson Cougar stalking the edge of town. It remembers teenagers encountering the Mochem. It remembers the Mauvaiseterre Hag. It remembers Larina Nichols walking into Paula's on a Saturday afternoon, Candy Mercer driving far too fast through town, and the Mercers' cat, "Pringles", sitting in a window watching something no one else can see.

Jackson works well as Jacksonville 86 + supernatural goings-on. But it has to be more than that. 

And I think that distinction is important. I am not trying to create a historically perfect reconstruction of Jacksonville in 1986. I am not writing a history book. I am building a place where people can play a horror game.

Don’t misunderstand me in that history is unimportant. It is the other way around: the real history is what gives Jackson some weight.  The streets need to feel right. The colleges need histories of their own. The old houses need to look like they have been standing there for generations. The downtown needs to feel like a Midwestern downtown in 1986, not like someone dropped a collection of "80s stuff" into a modern town. If I get those things right, then when I add a witch, a haunted house, or something moving through the cornfields at night, those things have something solid to stand on.

Then again, being authentic and being accurate are two different matters.

My memory can be faulty. I may have mixed up a building in my mind or conflated two stores into one, or carry a memory of 1985 as if it were timeless. Or I will come across something in Jacksonville’s actual past that I was unaware of back when I was living there and think Jackson ought to have its own take on it. At times I make changes simply because the town calls for them.

This is where the mirror is involved.

Jacksonville gives me the shapes. Memory gives me the colors. Forty years of gaming gives me the monsters hiding in the shadows. That is Jackson.

I went to Jacksonville looking for Jackson.

I didn't find it.

I found something better.

I found the place I remembered as Jackson.

I don't need a historically accurate Jacksonville, circa 1986, for Jackson. I just need a Jackson that feels like a believable Midwest town in 1986.

And then I can leave it all to you to bring it to life.

Monday, September 28, 2026

Mirror Monday: Local Legends Make Better Monsters

The Crimson Cougar returns
Sometimes the real world hands you a story at exactly the right time.

A little over a week ago, ABC7 Chicago reported multiple mountain lion sightings in southern Illinois. The Illinois Department of Natural Resources received reports from both Union and Jackson counties and believes they are likely sightings of the same animal.

Mountain lions are rare in Illinois. According to the report, this is only the twelfth confirmed mountain lion sighting in the state since 2002. But we (Illinoisans) have always known about cougars, mountain lions, and even panthers in Illinois. 

Naturally, one particular detail caught my attention.

Jackson County.

Sometimes the universe really isn't particularly subtle.

There is another connection here too. Carbondale, Illinois, the real-world inspiration for my fictional Carbon Vale, is in Jackson County. Official Jackson County sources identify Carbondale as one of the county's two largest cities. But I don't need the news to tell me this. I lived in Carbondale and Jackson County for seven years.

So we have Jackson County, Carbon Vale, and my fictional Jackson, Illinois, all suddenly connected by a mountain lion wandering into an area where mountain lions are not particularly common.

That immediately got me thinking about monsters. Especially with October on the very near horizon and my desire to get back to Monstrous Mondays.

More specifically, it got me thinking about why local legends make better monsters.

There's Something Out There

There is something wonderfully useful about a monster that occupies the space between "that doesn't live here" and "except sometimes it actually does."

That is where stories grow. There aren't mountain lions around here. Except my uncle saw one. Or my cousin's friend said his dad did.

There aren't supposed to be any. Then what did he see?

And now we have a local legend, or at the very least a fun rumor.

For Jackson, this gets even better because I am increasingly trying to look at the setting through the eyes of 1986. 

Today, when someone sees an unusual animal, everybody immediately reaches for their phone. There are photographs. Video. Social media. Trail cameras. GPS locations. Within hours, people are arguing online over whether the thing in the picture is a cougar, a bobcat, somebody's dog, or three blurry pixels and wishful thinking.

In 1986?

Your friend tells you that her older brother saw something behind the school.

That's it.

That's your evidence.

And tomorrow? The story will be even better.

The Crimson Cougar

The mascot of Jackson Public High School is the Crimson Cougar.

When I first came up with that, it was mostly because it sounded right. Plenty of high schools use big cats for mascots. Plus, there are the whole courgar/moutain lion/panther rumors I grew up hearing.

But once I started developing Jackson's local folklore, the Crimson Cougar became something else.

In Jackson, stories of the animal go back long before the high school adopted the name. Farmers and hunters told stories about a great red cat seen near fence lines, creeks, and fields. Some claimed it appeared before disasters. There were stories connecting it to a train wreck, a cholera outbreak, and the burning of Holmwood Hall at MacAlister College.

Eventually the town did what towns sometimes do. It took something people once feared and made it a mascot. Now it is painted on the gym walls. It is on football and marching band uniforms. It's on the cover of the yearbook.

Crimson Cougars logo

That history was already part of my Crimson Cougar write-up earlier this year. The actual mountain lion sightings this month make me like the idea even more.

  • Was the thing somebody saw outside Jackson really the Crimson Cougar?
  • Was it just a mountain lion passing through?
  • Was it a big bobcat seen under bad lighting?
  • Was it something else? 
  • It was seen when the old High School bell rang.

Excellent. I don't want to answer that question too quickly. Uncertainty is doing most of the work for me.

This Is Where 1986 Becomes My Mirror

One of the things I keep coming back to with Jackson is that 1986 can't simply be decoration. It can't just mean cassette tapes, Members Only jackets, malls, Reagan on TV, Duran Duran, and cars with terrible gas mileage.

The year has to affect how the characters experience the world. 

Information moved differently.

If someone tells Larina there is a cougar behind the football field, she can't pull up the Illinois Department of Natural Resources website. Stephanie can't check Facebook to see if anyone else reported it. Faye can't search Reddit. Vera can't ask whether somebody's Ring camera caught it.

They have to talk to people.

  • Who saw it?
  • Who told you?
  • Do you trust them?
  • Who did *they* hear it from?
  • Why is their version different from the version we heard yesterday?

Rumors have geography. They have social groups. The cheerleaders know one version. The football team knows another. The teachers have heard something else. The police aren't saying anything. Some old guy at Jones' Diner on Morgan remembers somebody seeing the same thing in 1956. The college kids hanging out at Big John's say it was just some bad LSD going around.

And Larina is suddenly asking questions. That is how I want mysteries in Jackson to develop.

Before there is a monster, there is a story.

The Monster Before the Monster

If I were running a Crimson Cougar adventure, I would resist showing the creature for as long as possible. First there are stories. Somebody sees eyes reflecting in their headlights. A dog refuses to go outside. Someone finds scratches on a tree. A freshman swears something followed him home. A mutilated deer or cow carcass turns up. Then someone says his grandfather saw the Crimson Cougar forty years ago.

Now we've moved beyond zoology.

Maybe there really is a mountain lion around Jackson. In fact, I think that makes the whole thing better. Every piece of evidence now has two explanations.

  • Those look like cougar tracks. Probably.
  • That sound could have been a cougar. Sure.
  • Something killed that deer. Cougars do that.
  • But why did it leave the heart behind? ...

Ah, now we have something. That little mystery that pushes Jackson out of the pages of National Geographic and into the pages of the National Inquirer. Or Weirdly World News, to be more specific. 

Jackson Has Its Own Monsters

The Crimson Cougar also helped me understand something about Jackson itself.  Jackson already has monsters. More importantly, they are Jackson's monsters.

That does not mean every one of them comes from documented Jacksonville folklore. They don't. What they have in common is that they grow out of the place. The Crimson Cougar begins with real Illinois wildlife and the uncertainty surrounding big-cat sightings.

Then there is MoChem.

MoChem goes back much farther for me.

I created the original version when I was ten years old, after reading Daniel Cohen's monster books and deciding that my hometown needed a monster of its own. The Jackson version connects childhood campfire stories from my time in the Boy Scouts to the real chemical plant outside of town. That became the fictional Morgan Chemical. Yes, the same Morgan Chemical where Candy's mom worked, and the same Morgan as Roderick Morgan.

Nobody agrees on what MoChem is.

  • Maybe it was created by chemical waste.
  • Maybe it was once a worker.
  • Maybe it was a deformed child.
  • Maybe it was a reporter who came to investigate Morgan Chemical and discovered something he wasn't supposed to know.

Those contradictory stories are important. In fact, they are vital. 

MoChem isn't just a monster living in an abandoned chemical plant.  MoChem is what happens when generations of kids are told not to go near the abandoned chemical plant.

Then there is Old Annie.

Old Annie is entirely my invention. I created her whole cloth, but she is built out of things that belong to Jackson and things I remember from Jacksonville.

Part of the inspiration comes from Jacksonville's inordinately large homeless population. Part comes from the old state hospital. Part comes from the waterways and low ground around the Mauvaisterre, the "bad land" that has become increasingly important to my fictional Jackson.

So everyone knows an Old Annie story.

  • She was a homeless woman.
  • She escaped from the state hospital.
  • She drowned her children.
  • She drowned herself.
  • College kids made her up as a prank.
  • There never was an "Annie."

Everybody knows somebody who knows somebody who saw her.

The truth, at least in my game, is stranger. Old Annie is the Mauvaisterre Hag, an ancient corrupted spirit associated with the land and water around Jackson.

Three monsters. Three different origins.

One begins with real wildlife.

One begins with childhood campfire stories and industrial anxiety.

One I invented completely.

But all three belong to Jackson. That distinction is becoming increasingly important to me.  A local monster does not have to be an authentic piece of documented folklore. It needs **roots**.  It should feel like something people in this particular place would tell stories about.

No Sasquatches in Jackson

This brings me to something else. I would love to put Sasquatches in the woods outside Jackson. Seriously.

Small Illinois town. Wooded roads. Cornfields. Creeks. Something large moving between the trees. Honestly, it practically writes itself. 

But there is only one problem. They don't seem to belong there.  I went looking.

The North American Wood Ape Conservancy maintains a searchable database of reported Bigfoot, Sasquatch, or "wood ape" encounters. It even classifies reports based on factors such as corroboration, physical evidence, and witness reliability.

I checked the years that matter most to my Jackson. 1980 through 1987. I could not find anything in that database that gives me an Illinois Bigfoot tradition during those Jackson years. In fact, it is not until the 2000s that there is even one sighting in Peoria. 

That doesn't mean nobody in Illinois ever told a Bigfoot story, and it certainly doesn't prove anything one way or another about Bigfoot.  

It just means I went looking for a local tradition I could use, and I didn't find one where I needed it.

So, there are no Sasquatches in Jackson.

In fact, that has become something of a running joke among the kids who know about the supernatural.

Val: "My dad used to be a big-time Bigfoot hunter in the 1970s."
Larina: "There has never been a credible Bigfoot sighting in Illinois."
Val, smiling: "Yeah. My dad did a great job."
Candy: "Gods, Val, you are an idiot."

Honestly, I like the joke much better than simply putting Bigfoot in the woods. It tells me something important about Val. That he is not just the dumb jock of the group, despite Candy's assurances. It tells me something alittle about his dad. Does the senior Moreno know about the supernatural or was he just amused by the bigfoot craze of the late 1970? It tells me something about Larina. Because of course she already looked it up in newspaper archives. It definitely tells me something about Candy. 

But most of all, it tells me something about Jackson.  Jackson has its own monsters.

Not Every Monster Belongs Everywhere

That might be the larger lesson. If local legends make better monsters, then the monsters a place doesn't have are important too.

It would be very easy to turn Jackson into Cryptid Disneyland. Bigfoot in the woods. Mothman on the bridge. Chupacabra eating livestock. UFOs overhead. Jersey Devil flying over the football field.

Eventually the setting stops feeling like Illinois and starts feeling like somebody dumped a cryptozoology encyclopedia onto the map. I know. I guilty of that exact problem.

I don't want that again.

That doesn't mean I can't invent monsters. Old Annie proves that. MoChem proves it too. The difference is that when I invent something, I want it to grow out of the setting. Why is this monster here?

  • What does it have to do with this road, this river, this factory, this cemetery, this school, or this town?
  • Who has been telling stories about it?
  • Who doesn't believe those stories?
  • Who remembers an older version?

If I can't answer those questions, maybe the monster belongs somewhere else. And maybe I should go there instead.

Go to Where the Monsters Are

I think I finally have an axiom for this.

Go to where the monsters are. Don't bring them to you.

Jackson already has enough problems. I don't need to import any. If I want a different sort of monster, I can go to Carbon Vale or Sunny Valley. For example, I have also decided that while there are not a lot of vampires in Jackson, both Carbon Vale and Sunny Valley are sick with them. I actually can't wait to show my new Sunny Valley vampires, but they will need to wait for another post.

This lesson has also been following me through another project.

When I started working seriously on my new Advanced Witches & Warlocks, I naturally began adding monsters. It made sense. A book about witches and warlocks is going to have creatures associated with witchcraft and the occult.  Familiars. Spirits. Demons. Hags. Things summoned in rituals. Things witches bargain with. Things witches fight. Things witches accidentally wake up. 

So I added monsters. Then I added more monsters. And then some more.

Eventually something became obvious. The monsters didn't belong in Advanced Witches & Warlocks.

Not because they were bad material. Quite the opposite. There were enough of them, with enough ideas attached to them, that treating them as supporting material for the Witch and Warlock classes was making them smaller than they should be.

They needed their own place. That realization eventually helped push those ideas toward Codex Qliphothica and my other monster work.

The monsters stopped being accessories for witches. They became inhabitants of their world. 

That feels like the same lesson I am learning from Jackson.

A Witch book should tell me how witches work. A monster book should tell me about the monsters. And a setting should tell me **where those monsters belong**.

Then the characters can go find them.

Let the Place Tell You What Lives There

Maybe that is the real trick. Start with the place. Look at its history.  Look at its geography. Look at its animals. Look at its abandoned buildings. Look at its industries. Look at the stories people actually tell. Look at the stories they *could* have told.

Then listen.

Maybe you find a real local legend. Great.

Maybe you find a mountain lion wandering through a part of Illinois where mountain lions are rare. Even better.

Maybe you remember an old Boy Scout campfire story and realize it belongs beside an abandoned chemical plant.

Maybe you look at a river, an old hospital, and people living at the margins of town, and eventually Old Annie crawls out of the mud.

The monster doesn't need to be real. The folklore doesn't even need to be real. But the connection to the place should feel real.

That is what makes the monster feel like it was there before the player characters arrived.

And that matters. Because the Crimson Cougar isn't waiting around for Larina Nichols to have an adventure. People were seeing it before Larina was born. MoChem doesn't exist because the kids need something to fight. People were warning children away from Morgan Chemical before they started asking questions.  Old Annie doesn't haunt the Mauvaisterre because I needed a hag encounter. People have been telling each other not to go down by the water after dark for longer than anyone remembers.

The characters didn't bring the monsters with them. The monsters were already there.They just made the mistake of going looking.

And really, isn't that how the best horror stories begin?

It is 1986. Someone saw something in the woods. There aren't supposed to be cougars in Illinois. There definitely aren't any Sasquatches around Jackson. And somewhere, Larina Nichols just heard a story she absolutely should leave alone.

So naturally, she is going to investigate. So will the PCs.

Now, get out there and go where the monsters are.